Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Ansupriya Satapathy – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cancellation of authorization being contested. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. grounds for challenging the cancellation order. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. allegations against the petitioner deemed unsupported. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 4. court's procedural analysis of the case. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. legal basis for cancellation under control order. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 6. court’s orders to restore authorization. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The Writ Petition has been preferred for quashing of the order of cancellation dated 29.09.2022(Annexure-8) of the Letter of Authorization, shortly, ‘LoA’, of Petitioner’s Firm so also proceedings of the Appeal dated 09.12.2022 (Annexure-10), vide which the said cancellation order dated 29.09.2022 was confirmed by Appellate Authority (O.P.3), with further prayer to restore the LoA of the Petitioner firm.
On 11.09.2022, the Assistant Agriculture Officer, acting as Fertilizer Inspector, along with Tahsildar, Satyabadi and Police, came to the unit of the Petitioner and collected two samples each of Vermi Compost and raw materials for Vermi Compost and one sample of Bio Fertilizer for testing purpose, which was the left-over stock from the previous year’s supply or
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
