Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Gandharbi Pathrimali @ Manjulata Budek – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Balangir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court judgment on writ petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background of the petitioner's selection. (Para 2) |
| 3. court analysis of evidence regarding residence. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 4. petitioner's argument on her residential status. (Para 4) |
| 5. opposite party's argument against petitioner's status. (Para 5) |
| 6. court's conclusion on the a.d.m.'s findings. (Para 7) |
| 7. order to set aside the a.d.m. ruling. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT :
Sashikanta Mishra, J.
The Petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following relief;
“It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to consider the facts stated in the writ petition, admit the same, issue Rule NISI calling upon the Opp. parties to show cause:-
(i) Why the order dtd.22.04.2015 passed by the learned Addl. District Magistrate, Balangir in AWW Appeal No.07 of 2011 shall not be quashed.
(ii) Why the petitioner shall not be allowed to continue as Anganwadi Worker of Dhumabhata-4 Anganwadi center in the district of Balangir.
If the Opp. parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause then the rule may kindly be made absolute.
And/or pass any other order/orders, direction/directions, writ/writs as this Hon'ble Court may d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
