SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2184

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Saumya Sajiv Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mahendra Bahadur Singh, Vijeta Singh
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Vinod Diwakar,J.

1. Heard Ms. Vijeta Singh, learned counsel for the applicant no.1, Mr. Chandan Sharma assisted by Mr. Shubham Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent, and perused the record.

2. The present application has been preferred for quashing the orders dated 28.08.2023 and 09.10.2023 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Court, Allahabad, as well as the order dated 10.09.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (MP/MLA), Prayagraj, in Criminal Appeal No.107 of 2024, titled as Saumya Sajiv Kumar Sharma and another v. Sumit Vats, arising out of proceedings under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, District Prayagraj.

3. In brief, the facts giving rise to the present proceedings are that the marriage between applicant no.1, [Hereinafter referred to as the “wife”] and respondent no.2, [Hereinafter referred to as the “husband”] was solemnized on 18.01.2013. At the time of marriage, a substantial dowry comprising jewellery, cash, and other valuable articles was given by the wife’s parents. Despite this, the in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top