SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK
B.R. Sarangi, S.K. Mishra, JJ.
State of Odisha & Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
Subrat Dash & Ors. – Opposite Parties
W.P(C) NO. 15998 of 2016
Decided On : 11-08-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S.N. Nayak, Addl. Standing Counsel
For the Opposite Party :M/s. D.K. Panda, G. Sinha, S. Behera and A. Mishra, Advocates, Mr. P.K. Mohanty, Sr. Advocate

Vacancies arising before the amendment of recruitment rules are governed by the old rules, allowing eligible candidates age relaxation.

Headnote:(A) Odisha Civil Services (Fixation of Upper Age Limit) Rules, 1989 - Proviso to Rule-2 - Writ Petition challenging the Tribunal's order extending age relaxation to candidates for posts of Assistant Agriculture Officer based on vacancies occurring prior to 15.07.2011. The court held that vacancies before the rule amendment are governed by old rules allowing age relaxation. (Paras 1, 4, 12)

(B) Legal principle regarding the application of recruitment rules and age limits based on vacancy dates was affirmed, following precedents including Y.V. Rangaiah and others, confirming older rules apply to existing vacancies. (Paras 10, 12)

Facts of the case:
Recruitment for Assistant Agriculture Officers was not held from 1991 to 2011, resulting in candidates becoming overage. A Tribunal ruled that the old age limit rules applied to vacancies before a 2011 amendment, allowing age relaxation to the candidates.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal’s decision was upheld, confirming entitlement to age relaxation for applicants whose requisition for recruitment existed before the amending rules came into effect.

Issues: The core issue of the case is whether the deleted Proviso to Rule-2 of the Rules, 1989 applies to vacancies that arose prior to 15.07.2011.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that vacancies prior to the rule amendment must adhere to the old rules, thus allowing age relaxation as per earlier provisions.

Result: Writ Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. writ petition to quash tribunal's directive (Para 1)
2. factual background of recruitment and age relaxation (Para 2)
3. tribunal's conclusion on vacancies and age relaxation (Para 3)
4. arguments by both parties regarding age limit (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
5. key question of law regarding the applicability of rules (Para 8)
6. application of old vs new rules on vacancies (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
7. court upholds tribunal's ruling based on prior vacancies (Para 12)

JUDGMENT :

B.R. SARANGI, J.

By means of this Writ Petition, filed at the instance of the State and its functionary, prayer has been made to quash the common Order dated 13.01.2016 passed in O.A. No.109 (C) of 2012 and batch, as at Annexure-3, whereby the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack has directed the State- Petitioners to extend age relaxation to Opposite Party No.1 and other Applicants in the connected Original Applications against the vacancies in the post of Assistant Agriculture Officer occurred prior to 15.07.2011, during which period the proviso to Rule-2 of the Odisha Civil Services (Fixation of Upper Age Limit) Rules, 1989 (in short Rules, 1989) was in force, with an observation that in the event Opposite Party No.1 and other Applicants are found eligible to such age relaxation, their candidature may be accepted and if they have already participated in the written test, their result should be declared along with other candidates. If any of the Applicants have not appeared in the written test and are found eligible on the basis of age relaxation, a Special Recruitment Test be conducted for them within a period of one month and consequential action be taken for declaration of result and for that requisite number of posts be kept vacant. It has also been observed that the said exercise, however, shall not be a bar for publication of result and issuance of appointment order of other selected candidates.

2. The factual matrix of the case, in brief, is that pursuant to an Advertisement was issued by Opposite Party No.3-Odisha Public Service Commission for filling up of the posts of Assistant Agriculture Officer, Opposite Party No.1, having requisite qualification, applied for the said post. As per criteria prescribed in the Advertisement, a candidate must be under 32 years and above 21 years of age as on 1st January, 2011, i.e., he/she must have been born not earlier than 2nd January, 1979 and not later than 1st January, 1990. As no recruitment was held for the post of Assistant Agriculture Officer for more than a decade and in the meantime, the candidates have become overage, they would be deprived of appearing the recruitment test in view of the upper age limit prescribed in the Advertisement.

2.1 As per Proviso to Rule-2 of the Orissa Civil Services (Fixation of Upper Age Limit) Rules, 1989, “if for any reason applications have not been invited by the Authority competent to conduct examination during any particular year to fill up the vacancies of that year, Applicants, who would have been eligible if applications were invited during that year, shall be eligible to compete at the examination held in the subsequent year”. In view of this, Rules, 1989 will be applicable to Odisha Subordinate Agriculture Service Rules, 1980 and while publishing the Advertisement, the Authorities ought to have stipulated the said Clause enabling the Applicants to appear in the recruitment test by relaxing the upper age limit.

2.2. As per information obtained under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short “RTI Act, 2005”), out of the sanctioned strength of 552 Jr. Agriculture Officers, 277 posts were vacant during the year 2005, 319 in 2007 and 326 in 2009, when the said posts were abolished and upgraded to that of Assistant Agriculture Officer (Group- B) in 2009. In the rank of Assistant Agriculture Officer, 118 posts were vacant in 2009 and it was increased to 415 in 2010, after the cadre strength of the Assistant Agriculture Officer was increased to 1166 du

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top