SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK
B.R.SARANGI, G.SATAPATHY, JJ.
Government of Orissa – Petitioner
Versus
Dr. Urmila Kumari Devi and Anr. – Opp. Parties
W.P(C) No. 14989 of 2010 
Decided On : 10-10-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Mishra, Addl. Govt. Adv.
For the Opp. Parties :M/s. S. Swain, D.P. Mishra and M. Pagal, Advocates

The government has inherent power to abolish posts without violating rights if no discrimination is shown; appointment rights depend on vacancies and must follow public selection procedures.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 310, 311, 14, 19(1)(f), and 31 - Service Law - Abolition of Post - The Government holds the inherent power to abolish posts without violating constitutional rights if not shown to be discriminatory or unjust - Recruitment for posts must be conducted by the OPSC following due procedure. (Paragraphs 7, 8, 9)

(B) Appointment Rights - Selection Board's merit list - Second position in merit does not grant a right to appointment if posts have been abolished; the appointment can only be made by public competition as per established policies. (Paragraph 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to quash a tribunal order directing appointment to a Demonstrator post, against which the State abolished one of two advertised positions, leading to the respondent's non-appointment despite being second in merit.

Findings of Court:
The tribunal's order was impermissible due to the post's abolition, and the claim for appointment lacked legal support.

Issues: Whether the tribunal erred in directing appointment post-abolition and the legality of appointment rights derived from the merit list.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the primary determination of appointment rights is governed by the existing vacancies, and position in the merit list alone does not confer rights against abolished posts.

Result: Writ petition allowed, tribunal order quashed.

Table of Content
1. background of the appointment case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. parties' contentions regarding appointment. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's analysis of the legal validity. (Para 6 , 9 , 10)
4. principles on abolition of posts by the state. (Para 7 , 8)
5. final conclusion and order of the court. (Para 11)

JUDGMENT :

B.R.SARANGI, J.

The Government of Orissa through its Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 13.04.2009 passed in O.A No.1295 of 1998, by which the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Bhubaneswar, has disposed of the said O.A. directing the petitioner to issue appointment order in favour of opposite party no.1 in the post of Demonstrator in the Drabyaguna discipline, in pursuance of the merit list dated 30.09.2007, and the entire exercise shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the copy of the order.

2. The factual matrix of the case, in brief, is that opposite party no.1 was initially appointed as Ayurvedic Medical Officer under the State Service during the year 1992. While continuing as such, she represented to DIM&H(O), Bhubaneswar to utilize her higher qualification in the interest of teaching in Ayurvedic Colleges, as she was a Post Graduate Degree Holder. Considering her grievance, DIM&H(O) deployed her temporarily at Gopabandhu Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya, Puri and assigned her duty to assist in teaching as Demonstrator in the discipline of Dravyaguna vide DIM&H(O) Order No.7756 dated.13.06.95. In the said order it was categorically mentioned that such posting of opposite party no.1 to impart teaching was a temporary arrangement and she would not claim her appointment to the post of Demonstrator as a matter of right.

2.1 An advertisement was published on 05.08.1997 by DIM&H(O) for filling up of 7 vacant posts of Demonstrator in different teaching disciplines of Government Ayurvedic Colleges of the State, out of which 2/3rd of the vacancies were to be filled up from service., i.e., from among the Ayurvedic Medical Officers of Government of Orissa prescribing no age limit for them. So far as Dravyaguna discipline is concerned, two vacancies were advertised to be filled up. The opposite party no.1, being a P.G. holder, had applied for the post of Demonstrator in Dravyaguna discipline.

2.2 In order to select suitable candidates to the post of Demonstrator of Government Ayurvedic Colleges of the State, a Selection Board was constituted by the Government of Orissa in Health & Family Welfare Department, vide Resolution No. 26485/H, dated 29.07.1989. So as to make the selection, prominent expert members of different teaching subjects were nominated by the Government vide G.O. No. 1723/H, dated 26.01.1997. The criteria for selection of Demonstrator were also decided vide G.O. No.26898/H dated 02.08.1989.

2.3 Before conducting interview, the Selection Board examined the applications of the candidates and accordingly a programme was drawn up to call for the candidates for attending the interview on 28.09.1997 and 29.09.1997. As regards filling up of 2 vacant posts in the Dravyaguna discipline, total 6 eligible candidates including opposite party no.1 had applied. All of them were intimated to appear the interview as per programme. All the six candidates belonging to Drvayaguna discipline attended the interview on 28.09.1997 and 29.09.1997. As per the advertisement, 2/3rd vacanccies were required to be filed up from among the in–service candidates and balance 1/3rd vacancies were to be filled up from eligible direct candidates pursuant to criteria fixed by the Government as per G.O.No.32670/H dated 19.09.1992. Out of six candidates of Dravyaguna discipline, 4 were in-service Ayurvedic Doctors and 2 were direct candidates. On performance of those six candidates in the interview, the Board prepared a merit list containing the names of three candidates, out of which one direct and one in- service were enlisted against

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top