SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 251

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
K.R.MOHAPATRA, J.
Hemanta Kumar Parida – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Bhubaneswar and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 30466 of 2023
Decided On : 06-02-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : D.P. Nanda, Shreya Pattnaik
For the Respondent: Debendra Kumar Mohanty

The Appropriate Authority becomes functus officio after 90 days of receiving a renewal application, resulting in automatic renewal of the registration certificate if not acted upon.

Headnote:(A) Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection), Rules, 1996 - Rule 8(3) and 8(6) - Renewal of certificate of registration - Rejection of renewal application after statutory period - Appropriate Authority's failure to act within 90 days rendered it functus officio, leading to deemed renewal of the registration certificate. (Paras 3.1, 5, 6)

(B) Jurisdiction - The order of rejection was deemed passed without jurisdiction due to delays in adhering to statutory timelines. (Paras 3.3, 6)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner, who runs an Ultrasound Clinic, faced rejection of an application for renewal of registration due to procedural issues regarding incomplete documentation, as well as delays by the Appropriate Authority.

Findings of Court:
The court held the renewal should be deemed granted as per the statutory provision due to the lapse of the 90-day requirement for decision-making.

Issues: Whether the rejection of the renewal application was valid given the delay in the process as stipulated by the Rules.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the statutory timeline established for the renewal process must be adhered to, and non-compliance by the authorities results in automatic renewal of certification.

Result: Writ petition allowed; order under Annexure-7 set aside.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks to challenge renewal application rejection. (Para 2)
2. application for renewal and procedural violations outlined. (Para 3)
3. opposition arguments related to allegations against the doctor. (Para 4)
4. court observes 90-day limit breach on decision. (Para 5)
5. certificate deemed renewed under sub-rule (6) ruling. (Para 6)
6. court sets aside rejection and allows operation. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT :

K.R. MOHAPATRA, J.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. The Petitioner in this writ petition seeks to assail the e-mail dated 5th August, 2023 (Annexure-7) attaching the reasoned order in Form-C passed by the Appropriate Authority under Rule 8(3) of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection), Rules, 1996 (as amended in 2017) (for short ‘the Rules’), whereby an application submitted by him for renewal of certificate of registration in respect of Shree Krishna Ultrasound Clinic at Karigara Sahi, Dhenkanal, has been rejected.

3. Mr. Nanda, learned Senior Advocate submits that the Petitioner-Proprietor runs the aforesaid Ultrasound Clinic and he was issued with a registration certificate on 20th July, 2017 (Annexure-1). In due course, he made an application on 20th February, 2023 (Annexure-3) in Form-A for renewal of certificate of registration. On receipt of the said application, a show cause notice was issued on 18th April, 2023 (Annexure-4). On receipt of the show cause reply, his application was rejected on the ground that the name of the Doctor was not stated in the application in Form-A. The reasoned order was communicated to the Petitioner through e-mail dated 25th April, 2023 (Annexure-5). Accordingly, the Petitioner made a fresh application on 24th May, 2023 in Form-A complete in all respect. Upon receipt of the said application, the Petitioner alleged to have been issued with a notice to show cause on 25th July, 2023. However, the renewal application was again rejected by the District Magistrate & Collector, Dhenkanal- Opposite Party No.2 vide order dated 5th August, 2023 under Annexure-7. Hence, this writ petition has been filed.

3.1 Mr. Nanda, learned Senior Advocate drew attention of this Court to Rule 8 of the Rules, which deals with the procedure for renewal of certificate of registration. It is his submission that an application for registration has to be filed in Form-A. On receipt of the said application, the Appropriate Authority shall hold an enquiry under sub-rule (2) of Rule 8 and after satisfying itself that the Applicant has complied with all the requirements of the Act and Rules, renew the certificate of registration in Form-B. If after enquiry and giving opportunity of hearing to the Applicant and having regard to the advice of the Advisory Committee, the Appropriate Authority is satisfied that the Applicant has not complied with the requirements of the Act and the Rules, it shall, for the reasons to be recorded in writing, reject the application for renewal of certificate of registration under Rule 8(3) of the Rules. However, sub-rule (6) of Rule 8 deals with the period of limitation for entertaining an application for renewal of certificate of registration. Sub-rule (6) of Rule 8 provides as under:

8. Renewal of registration:-

xx xx xx

6) In the event of failure of the Appropriate Authority to renew the certificate of registration or to communicate rejection of application for renewal of registration within a period of ninety days from the date of receipt of application for renewal of registration, the certificate of registration shall be deemed to have been renewed.”

3.2 Referring to the counter affidavit filed by Opposite Party Nos.2 and 3, wherein it is specifically stated that the Petitioner was issued with a show cause notice on 25th July, 2023, Mr. Nanda, learned Senior Advocate submits that the notice to show cause was issued beyond 90 days of making application for renewal of certificate of registration, which was made on 24th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top