IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
Savita W/o Pramod Padature @ Savita Vinayak Indrale – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 1123 of 2024
Decided On : 06-02-2024
Sonography Machine - Renewal of Registration - PCPNDT Act, 1994, Rules of 1996 and 2014 - The court found that the authorities failed to follow the prescribed procedure for renewal of registration, leading to the deemed renewal of the certificate. The authorities did not issue the renewal certificate despite the petitioner passing the competency exam, and the sealing of the sonography machine was deemed highhanded and in disregard of the rules.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a medical practitioner, applied for renewal of registration for her sonography center as required by the PCPNDT Act and rules. Despite the deemed renewal of the certificate, the authorities did not issue the renewal certificate and sealed the sonography machine, causing loss to the petitioner.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the authorities acted highhandedly and in disregard of the rules by sealing the sonography machine despite the deemed renewal of the certificate. The court directed the authorities to de-seal the machine and issue the renewal certificate within 30 days.
Issues: Failure of authorities to follow the prescribed procedure for renewal of registration, sealing of sonography machine despite deemed renewal, and loss caused to the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: The authorities must follow the prescribed procedure for renewal of registration, and the sealing of the sonography machine must be in accordance with the provisions of the PCPNDT Act and rules.
Final Decision: The petition is allowed, and the authorities are directed to de-seal the sonography machine and issue the renewal certificate within 30 days. The authorities agreed to donate to the Advocate’s Association of the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad.
JUDGMENT :
1. The Petitioner has put-forth prayer clause-B, C and D as under:
(C) Pending hearing and final disposal of this writ petition, the effect, operation and execution of the impugned action dated 28/12/2023 taken by respondent No. 2 and 3 thereby sealing the sonography machine of petitioner be stayed and kept in abeyance. Consequently, the respondent No. 2 and 3 be directed to de-seal the sonography machine of petitioner forthwith and for that purpose necessary directions be issued.
(D) Pending hearing and final disposal of the Writ Petition respondents be directed to allow the petitioner to operate the sonography centre of petitioner as earlier as per law and for that purpose necessary directions be issued.”
2. The undisputed facts in this case are as under:
(b) She applied in 2002 to the Respondent No. 2-Competent Authority for permission to register and operate a Sonography Centre under the provisions of the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the PCPNDT Act) and the rules of 1996 framed thereunder (the 1996 rules).
(c) She was granted such a registration and permission. Every 5 years, she was issued with the renewal of her registration.
(d) Her permission and licence to operate the Sonography Centre was to expire on 06.02.2022. Rule 8 (1) mandates the Petitioner to file an application in Form-A for seeking renewal of the certificate of registration, prior to 30 days of the expiry of the certificate of registration. The department is obliged to issue an acknowledgment of receipt in the manner specified under Sub-Rule 2 of Rule 4.
(e) The Appropriate Authority is obliged to hold an inquiry and after it is satisfied that the applicant has complied with all the requirements of the Act and the Rules and having regard to the advice of the advisory committee in this behalf, the renewal certificate of registration is to be issued in Form-B for a further period of five years from the date of the expiry of the certificate of registration.
(f) Clause-6 below Rule 8 mandates that in the event of failure of the Appropriate Authority to renew the certificate of registration or to communicate the rejection of the application for seeking renewal of registration, within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of the application for renewal, the certificate of registration shall be deemed to have been renewed.
(g) No rejection was communicated to the Petitioner within a period of 90 days.
(h) As on 19.04.2022, the Petitioner’s application seeking renewal of registration was deemed to be accepted. Needless to state, a certificate had to be necessarily issued by the Authority.
(i) On 26.04.2022, the District Civil Surgeon conveyed to the Petitioner that in view of the change in the 2014 Rules under Clause-7 thereof, the Petitioner has to undergo a specific training for handling the sonography machine under the State Commission for Medical Education Department with the approved Government Medical Institution for a period of six months. In the last paragraph of the communication, it is mentioned that, on the condition of clearing the competency exam and undergoing six months training certificate to be produced, the renewal of the certificate of registration would be issued, and if such competency exam and six months training certificates were not produced within six months from the date of issuance of the renewal certifi
Janaki Ultra Sound Center vs. Appropriate Authority and Others
Authorities must follow the prescribed procedure for renewal of registration, and the sealing of the sonography machine must be in accordance with the provisions of the PCPNDT Act and rules.
The Appropriate Authority becomes functus officio after 90 days of receiving a renewal application, resulting in automatic renewal of the registration certificate if not acted upon.
Strict compliance with the provisions of the PCPNDT Act is essential to prevent sex determination and female foeticide, and non-compliance cannot be excused as a clerical error.
The importance of maintaining records as prescribed under the Act and Rules, and the legal implications of non-compliance.
Power of judicial review under Article 226 of Constitution of India, it being discretionary and equitable remedy, Writ Court may decline to grant relief to a petitioner, in given facts even if legal ....
Procedural safeguards must be strictly adhered to in actions taken under the PCPNDT Act as arbitrary actions undermine the statutory framework.
The court affirmed that procedural fairness requires the Applicant's clinic to be de-sealed while allowing appeal processes to address regulatory compliance and safety concerns in a timely manner.
The court emphasized the necessity of timely processing of renewal applications and adherence to procedural safeguards before initiating criminal proceedings under the Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.