SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 360

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K.PANIGRAHI
Bapun @ Mrunmaya Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sudipto Panda
For the Respondent: Ch. Satyajit Mishra

Table of Content
1. background of the case and charges (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments against allegations and legal precedents (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15)
3. court's analysis of the charges (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
4. conclusion and order of the court (Para 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT :

1. In this CRLREV, the Petitioner challenges the order dated 16.05.2022 passed by the learned Judge, Special Court under S.C. & ST (PA) Act- cum- Additional Sessions Judge, Angul in C.T. (Special) Case No.01 of 2021 rejecting his petition under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. for discharging him from the alleged offences under Sections 417 / 376(2)(n) of the I.P.C. and Sections 3 (1)(w)/3(2)(v) of the S.C. & S.T. (PA) Act while discharging him from the offence under Section 493 of the I.P.C.

2. Brief fact of the case is that the Petitioner has a shop where Xerox facility is available besides sale of clothes and chappals and the victim was a customer. Four months prior to lodging of the FIR i.e. 06.11.2020, the Petitioner allegedly called over her phone and expressed his love with a promise to marry her and take her away. In the process of repeated phone calls, both of them developed love for eac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top