SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 324

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.P.ROUTRAY, J.
Sanjib Kumar Dalpat - Petitioner
Versus
State of Odisha and others - Opposite Parties
W.P.(C) No.11296 of 2024
Decided On : 23-08-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S.S. Mohanty, Advocate
For the Opposite Parties :Mr. K. Das, A.S.C. Mr. J. Barik, Advocate

The refusal of land conversion from agricultural to non-agricultural was invalid as it was based on an unfinalized Comprehensive Development Plan, affirming the right to conversion in a residential zone.

Headnote:(A) Odisha Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Section 8-A - Conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural purpose - Petitioner sought conversion of land measuring Ac.0.06 decimals; initially allowed for Ac.0.54 decimals but rejected due to proposed road by SDA - Authority's reasoning questioned as CDP not finalized - Court found refusal erroneous as land in residential zone without final plan - Orders quashed directing conversion to be permitted. (Paras 4, 7, 8)

(B) Writ Petition - The scope of a High Court in a writ petition is to determine the legality of the orders under challenge and ensure that the authority acted in accordance with the law. (Para 9)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner applied for conversion of agricultural land to homestead, initially allowed for part but rejected for Ac.0.06 decimals based on a proposed road by SDA, which has not been finalized. The land is in a residential zone.

Findings of Court:
The Court found that the refusal of conversion was based on an erroneous understanding as the Comprehensive Development Plan had not been finalized, thus quashing the earlier orders.

Issues: The main issue was whether the refusal to convert the land was lawful given the lack of finalization of the proposed road plan and the land's residential zoning.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court reasoned that without a finalized CDP, the refusal to convert the land based on a proposed road was invalid, affirming that the conversion did not violate any applicable law or master plan.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. facts of petition for land conversion (Para 2 , 3)
2. governance under odisha land reforms act (Para 4 , 5)
3. sda's counter and proposal for road (Para 6)
4. court's reasoning on land use and authority (Para 7 , 8)
5. disposition of writ petition (Para 9)

JUDGMENT :

B.P.ROUTRAY, J.

1. Heard Mr. S.S. Mohanty, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, Mr. K. Das, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State- Opposite Parties 1 to 4 and Mr. J. Barik, learned counsel for Opposite Party No.5.

2. The writ petition is directed against order dated 01.03.2024 passed by the Sub-Collector, Sadar, Sambalpur in OLR Appeal No.01 of 2021 under Annexure-6.

3. The Petitioner is a resident within Sambalpur Municipal Corporation area and applied for conversion of his land measuring area Ac.0.06 decimals as homestead. The case land is presently in the status of agricultural land. The prayer for conversion was rejected on the ground that the land in question, i.e. Plot No.1409/3989 under MS Khata No.644/912 measuring area Ac.0.06 decimals of mouza-STU No.5, Sakhigopinath in Sambalpur Town is coming within the proposed road of SDA. Initially a patch of land measuring Ac.0.60 decimals was applied for conversion by the Petitioner for non- agricultural purpose before the Tahasildar in OLR Case No.643 of 2017. The Tahasildar allowed the conversion in respect of Ac.0.54 decimals and refused in respect of Ac.0.06 decimals on the ground that proposed road of SDA falls on such part of the land. The Petitioner then preferred appeal before the Sub-Collector and the Sub-Collector in the impugned order dated 01.03.2024 confirmed the direction of the Tahasildar. The same is the subject matter of challenge in the present writ petition.

4. Before delving into the facts of the case, it needs to be mentioned that, conversion of the land from agricultural purpose to non-agricultural purpose is governed by the provisions contained in Section 8-A of the Odisha Land Reforms Act, 1960 (in short, “OLR Act”). Sub-Section (1) of Section 8-A of the OLR Act prescribes for conversion of any agricultural land belonging to a raiyat for any purposes other than agriculture upon satisfaction that such conversion shall not violate any master plan, improvement scheme, development plan or town planning scheme, made or published under the Odisha Town Planning Improvement Trust Act, 1956 (Odisha Act 10 of 1957) or under the Odisha Development Authorities Act 14 of 1982 or under any law for the time being in force and applicable to such land; and any other condition as may be prescribed for the purpose of dealing with bona fide cases of such conversions.

This being the provision of law governing the field, the case of the Petitioner for conversion of the land for non-agricultural purpose is to be considered in the wake of the reasons given in the impugned orders.

5. Admittedly the case land falls within Sambalpur town area. There is no quarrel over the fact that the land is surrounded by residential areas and residential houses. According to the Petitioner, when conversion of the land to the extent of area Ac.0.54 decimals has been allowed out of the same patch, no reason is left there to refuse in respect of area Ac.0.06 decimals on the ground that the same is falling in the proposed road of Sambalpur Development Authority (“SDA”). In this regard, the Petitioner got RTI information from the authority disclosing that, the Comprehensive Development Plan (“CDP”) of Sambalpur is at draft stage and yet to be finalized. Said RTI information is dated 19.07.2024 and it is fairly agreed by learned counsel for SDA that CDP has not been finalized till date.

6. The SDA has filed its counter. In the counter, it is specifically mentioned in paragraph 4 that, “Though CDP has not attained finality but there being proposal for road covering part of the plot, SDA felt it appropriate to inform the matter to the OLR authority for their consideration and for appropriate order.” It is further stated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top