Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C.BEHERA
Bhagabatia Bhainsa – Appellant
Versus
Ram Bihari Bhainsa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the appeal for partition (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendants' claims and suit issues (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. trial court's decisions and plaintiff's appeal (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal implications of remarriage on inheritance (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. daughters' rights to inheritance post-amendment (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. judgment allowed, plaintiffs entitled to partition (Para 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This 2nd Appeal has been preferred against the confirming Judgment.
The respondents of this 2nd Appeal were the defendants before the Trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No.75 of 1986 and they were the respondents before the First Appellate Court in the 1st Appellate Court vide T.A. No.20 of 1996.
3. According to the averments made by the plaintiffs in their plaint, they (plaintiffs) are the mother and daughter respectively. Their family pedigree as given in their plaint is depicted hereunder:
As per the genealogy given by the plaintiffs in their plaint, Pandi Bhainsa was their common ancestor. The wife of Pandi Bhainsa pre deceased him (Pandi Bhainsa). Pandi Bhainsa died about 30 years back leaving behind his 3 sons i.e. Bhagabatia, Rama (defendant No.1) and Rajendra (defen
Widow's remarriage does not strip her of inheritance rights, and married daughters have equal entitlement to family property under the amended Hindu Succession Act.
The omission of Section 23 of the Hindu Succession Act allows a married daughter to seek partition in joint family property, disregarding her marital status and absence of other daughters.
Joint ownership claims persist until partition; rights in a partition suit are not bound by limitation, and the burden to prove legal necessity for property transfer lies with the transferee.
The court reaffirmed that daughters have equal rights as sons in ancestral properties, emphasizing the applicability of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act.
In partition suits under the Hindu Succession Act, successors are entitled to equal shares regardless of prior unauthorized mutations in land records, affirming co-ownership rights.
Previous family partition and lack of joint family status preclude the plaintiff from claiming coparcenary rights under Hindu law amendments.
A party may not amend a suit's claims regarding ownership of property in a manner contradicting original pleadings without introducing adequate supporting evidence, undermining the integrity of legal....
Daughters have equal rights to inherit family property under the Hindu Succession Act, regardless of their marital status or the timing of their birth relative to the Act's enactment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
