Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K.PANIGRAHI
Sujit Kumar Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for return of mortgaged documents (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner claims hardship due to document non-return (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court finds bank's refusal unjustifiable (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. court's directive for compensation and return of documents (Para 17 , 18) |
| 5. writ petition allowed (Para 19) |
Judgment :
1. In filing this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has sought for a direction from this Court to the Opposite Parties/Bank authorities for returning his original mortgaged title deeds submitted at the time of availing the loan in question
I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE
4. After availing the loan since the failed to pay the loan E.M.Is in time, the loan account in question became NPA. Hence, the Opposite Party No.2/Bank initiated a proceeding vide TMS No.297 of 1988 before the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), First Court, Cuttack for recovery of a sum of Rs.2,50,592.25 paise as on 25.10.1987.
6. Soon after getting the information regarding the said scheme, the Petitioner submitted an application for settlement of the loan outstanding dues as per the said scheme. Accordingly, the loan outstanding dues of th
Once a loan is settled, banks must return original mortgaged documents promptly, as withholding them without justification constitutes neglect and may warrant compensation.
A bank cannot assert a general lien over title deeds related to a home loan to secure unrelated debts; repayment of the home loan extinguishes the lien.
A borrower is entitled to the return of mortgaged documents upon full payment of the loan amount, reinforcing the legal obligation of lenders to return such documents.
Home loan – No law for time being in force, permits bank to retain title deeds alleging dues in respect of any other transaction, under Section 171 of Contract Act.
Loan write-off does not extinguish the creditor's right to recover dues.
High Court in exercise of its discretion does not ordinarily assist the tardy and the indolent or the acquiescent and the lethargic. If there is inordinate delay on the part of the petitioner and suc....
Under an order of attachment, the bank cannot retain the title deeds, and the affected party must seek their remedy in accordance with the law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
