IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Manasi Das @ Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's background and prior attempts to seek appointment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the inclusion of divorced daughters in the definition of family members. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. opposition's argument on previous rules and rejection of the petitioner's representation. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. key judgments on compassionate appointments referenced regarding application consideration. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court's observation on the rejection based on valid rules. (Para 9) |
| 6. final order allowing the petitioner to file a new representation. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
S.K. MISHRA, J.
1. The Petitioner, who is the daughter of late Golekh Chandra Das, who died while working as a Class-IV employee under the Cuttack Municipal Corporation (CMC), Cuttack, on 8th March, 2002, has filed this Writ Petition with a prayer to quash the Order dated 25th April, 2015, vide which her representation for appointment under the Rehabilitation Scheme was rejected and to direct the Opposite Parties to give her appointment under the Rehabilitation Scheme or on compassionate ground to save her life, so also life of her ailing mother.
2. Admittedly, because of non-consideration of the case of the Petitioner, s
Legally divorced daughters qualify as 'family members' under the amended Rehabilitation Rules, ensuring entitlement to compassionate appointment is based on current eligibility norms.
Daughters of deceased employees cannot be denied employment under the Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme solely based on their marital status, as per the Orissa Civil Services (Rehabilitation Assistanc....
Compassionate appointment under the Odisha Civil Service Rules is only available to unmarried daughters, and delay in application processing does not confer eligibility if marital status changes.
The court determined that barring married daughters from receiving rehabilitation benefits is unconstitutional and directed that such claims be reconsidered accordingly.
Exclusion of married daughters from compassionate appointments violates constitutional rights and undermines dependency considerations under the Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme.
A married daughter is entitled to compassionate appointment under the Orissa Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990, as the exclusion based on marital status is unconstitutional.
Married daughters of deceased Government servants are entitled to be considered for appointment under the Odisha Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990, if they fulfill the requirement....
Compassionate appointments must comply with the statutory regulations and instructions, and the financial condition of the family must be considered. Separation from the family must be established by....
The court held that marital status should not disqualify a married daughter from compassionate appointment, focusing instead on dependency to determine eligibility.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.