SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 626

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
S.K.SAHOO, J.
Biswanath Sabar – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JCRLA No.6 of 2021
Decided On : 16-08-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Debendra Narayan Pattanaik, Amicus Curiae
For the Respondent: Mr. Manoranjan Mishra, Addl. Standing Counsel

The court found that the accused committed grievous hurt rather than murder, emphasizing the lack of intention to kill based on evidence of a single, non-lethal blow.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 302 and 304 Part-I - Conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder - Accused assaulted the deceased with a sharp instrument, resulting in death - Intent and knowledge required for determining culpability assessed based on evidence and circumstances of the case - Conviction altered from Section 304 Part-I to Section 326. (Paras 34, 32)

(B) Evidence - Importance of eye witness accounts and medical testimony in establishing cause of death - Medical opinion considered crucial in assessing the nature of injuries - Prior quarrel and absence of premeditation factored into the decision. (Paras 22, 24, 28)

Facts of the case:
The appellant assaulted the deceased during a quarrel, inflicting severe injuries with a sharp object, leading to the latter’s death during treatment after hours. The incident occurred on 01.01.2019 while the deceased was on his way to a village feast. (Paras 1-3)

Findings of Court:
The trial court found that the accused acted with knowledge but not intention to kill; hence, he was guilty of grievous hurt, altering conviction to Section 326. (Paras 30-34)

Issues: The court addressed whether the act constituted culpable homicide or merely grievous hurt given the nature of the injury and circumstances of the assault. (Paras 23-24)

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the single blow, while severe, did not demonstrate intent to kill, primarily guided by the established principles of mens rea and previous case law regarding similar instances of assault. (Paras 29-30)

Result: Conviction altered from Section 304 Part-I to Section 326; sentence reduced to time served. (Paras 35-36)

Table of Content
1. overview of the prosecution case and trial (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. arguments presented by the parties (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
3. evidence and eyewitness accounts analyzed (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. culpable homicide and intention vs. knowledge (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
5. legal precedent on culpable homicide (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
6. conclusion and reduction of sentence (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)

JUDGMENT :

S.K. SAHOO, J.

The appellant Biswanath Sabar faced trial in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Paralakhemundi in S.T. Case No.16 of 2019 for commission of offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter 'I.P.C.') on the accusation that on 01.01.2019 at about 3.30 p.m. at village Krushnapur under Serango police station, he committed murder of informant's father, namely, Rabi Sabar (hereinafter 'deceased') by assaulting him with a sharped 'kati' intentionally with the knowledge that death would be caused by such assault.

2. The learned trial Court vide impugned judgment and order dated 19.10.2020 has been pleased to hold the appellant guilty under section 304 Part-I of the I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- (rupees two thousand), in default, to suffer R.I. for a further period of six months.

The Prosecution Case

3. The prosecution case, as per the first information report (hereinafter 'F.I.R.') lodged by Puspanjali Bhuyan (P.W.4), the daughter of the deceased, in short, is that on 01.01.2019 during day time, on the eve of New Year, the villagers of Kujasingh, Seranga, Gajapati were organizing a feast in village Krushnapur. The deceased was engaged in repairing the fence and the informant invited him to attend the feast through her brother Jagannath Sabar (P.W.11). While P.W.11 and the deceased were coming together to attend the feast, on the way, the appellant on account of previous dispute assaulted the deceased by means of a sharped 'kati' on the back of his left leg. Hearing the shout of the deceased as well as P.W.11, the villagers rushed to the spot and seeing them, the appellant decamped from the spot and the deceased was found to have sustained serious bleeding injuries on the leg for which he was immediately shifted to the District Headquarters Hospital, Paralakhemundi. While undergoing treatment at the hospital, the deceased succumbed to his injuries at about 8.00 p.m.

4. The report was presented by P.W.4 on 02.01.2019 before the Inspector in-charge of Rayagada police station and accordingly, Rayagada P.S. Case No.01 dated 02.01.2019 was registered under section 302 of the I.P.C. against the appellant. On registration of the case, the Inspector in-charge directed P.W.15 Karunakar Sahu, who was attached to Rayagada police station as S.I. of Police, to take up investigation of the case.

5. During course of investigation, P.W.15 examined the informant (P.W.4), took steps for guarding the dead body of the deceased and visited the spot, examined material witnesses, arrested the appellant on 03.01.2019. On the basis of the statement of the appellant, the weapon of offence i.e. sharp cutting 'kati' was recovered from a paddy bag and it was seized in the presence of the witnesses. The appellant was sent for medical examination, inquest over the dead body was conducted and it was sent for post mortem examination. P.W.15 received the post mortem report and he made a query to the doctor conducting post mortem examination regarding possibility of injury with the weapon seized at the instance of the appellant and received the report. The wearing apparels of the appellant were also seized and the charge of investigation was handed over on 30.03.2019 to P.W.21 Ratnanidhi Patra, who was also the S.I. of Police attached to Rayagada police station. P.W.21 also revisited the spot, reexamined the witnesses and received the sanction order from the Collector, Gajapati, Paralakhemundi a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top