MANGAL MAJHI vs KHELA MAJHI - 2026 Supreme(Ori) 567

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Ori) 567

ORISSA HIGH COURT
MANGAL MAJHI – Appellant
Versus
KHELA MAJHI – Respondent

JUDGMENT :

A.C. Behera, J.

This 2^nd appeal has been preferred against the confirming judgment.

2. The appellants in this 2^nd appeal were the defendant Nos.1 to 5 before the Trial Court in the suit, vide T.S. No.46 of 1996 and appellants before the 1^st Appellate Court in the 1^st Appeal vide T.A. No.52 of 1999.

The respondent Nos.1 & 2 in this 2^nd appeal were the plaintiffs before the Trial Court in the suit vide T.S.46 of 1996 and respondent Nos.1 & 2 before the 1^st Appellate Court in the 1^st Appeal vide T.A. No.52 of 1999.

The respondent Nos.3 to 8 in this 2^nd appeal were the defendant Nos.6 to 11 before the Trial Court in the suit vide T.S.46 of 1996 and respondent Nos.3 to 8 before the 1^st Appellate Court in the 1^st Appeal vide T.A. No.52 of 1999.

3. The suit of the plaintiffs (respondent Nos.1 & 2 in this 2^nd appeal) before the Trial Court vide T.S.46 of 1996 was a suit for declaration, confirmation of possession, permanent injunction, for correction of names of the defendant Nos.1 to 5 from the R.o.R. and in alternative recovery of possession, if they (plaintiffs) are found to be dispossessed from the suit properties during the pendency of the suit.

4. The properties described in Sche