SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 688

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJEEB K. PANIGRAHI, J.
Prahallad Biswal – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Behera and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 11988 of 2025
Decided On : 09-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ashok Kumar Parija, Arnav Behera
For the Respondents: Bibekananda Nayak, Sankar Prasad Pani, Susanta Kumar Mishra, Shanti Prakash Mohanty

Environmental compensation must adhere to principles of natural justice and proportionality, ensuring that penalties correlate with actual damage and supported by robust evidence.

Headnote:(A) National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Section 22 - Environmental Compensation for excess mining - The petitioner’s appeal against the imposition of Rs. 96,28,50,175/- as environmental compensation was founded on allegations of illegal mining while not duly considering relevant material. The court emphasized the principles of natural justice, noting that non-disclosure of data and disproportionate penalties render the order arbitrary and void. (Paras 9, 12, 18)

(B) Natural Justice - Principles - The court found that the Tribunal's reliance on selective material and a lack of proportionality in imposing a significant penalty without properly addressing third-party illegal mining lacked fairness and due process. (Paras 13, 16)

(C) Proportionality - Environmental compensation must be proportional to the damage and supported by a rational methodology; the court underscored that substantial penalties must correlate with actual royalty paid. (Paras 16, 19)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged an order from the National Green Tribunal imposing a massive environmental compensation due to alleged excess mining, arguing that illegal activities by third parties contributed to the surplus. They claimed the Tribunal erred by disregarding relevant evidence and applying disproportionate liability.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the impugned order violated principles of natural justice and lacked proportionality, warranting a remand for reconsideration with complete transparency.

Issues: The primary issues included the legality of the Tribunal's process in calculating the penalty, the adequacy of opportunities for the petitioner to defend against claims, and whether the excess mining attributed to the petitioner was accurately assessed.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioner was not adequately afforded due process, highlighting the need for transparency in decisions resting on scientific data and ensuring that penalties reflect actual impacts and proportions.

Result: The impugned order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.

Table of Content
1. factual background of mining lease and operations. (Para 2)
2. petitioner's claims regarding illegal mining and obligations. (Para 3)
3. detailed arguments against tribunal's conclusions. (Para 4)
4. maintainability of writ petition and statutory remedies. (Para 5 , 6 , 9)
5. exceptions to alternative remedy rule. (Para 7 , 8)
6. non-consideration of evidence leading to arbitrary decisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
7. principles of natural justice and proportionality. (Para 13 , 14 , 16)
8. final decision to set aside order based on reasoning. (Para 17 , 19)
9. conclusion on writ petition and its disposal. (Para 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT :

SANJEEB K. PANIGRAHI, J.

1. The petitioner, in the present Writ Petition, assails the order dated 11.02.2025 passed by the National Green Tribunal, Eastern Zone Bench, Kolkata in Original Application No. 122/2023/EZ, whereby environmental compensation of Rs. 96,28,50,175/- has been imposed on the petitioner on the allegation of excess mining beyond the Consent to Establish (CTE).

I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE:

2. Succinctly put, the facts of the case are as follows:

(i) Desirous of granting a lease in respect of Damanbhuin Laterite Stone Quarry, District Khordha, the Tahasildar, Tangi issued a notice for auction, whereupon the petitioner was selected as the preferred bidder. On 12.08.2021, the petitioner was directed to deposit the royalty and execute an agreement.

(ii) The Tahasildar, Tangi obtained environmental clearance for mining of laterite stone at the Damanbhuin Laterite Stone Quarry, District Khordha on 06.07.2021 from the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India. The environmental clearance was subsequently transferred in favour of the petitioner on 15.03.2022.

(iii) Thereafter, the Tahasildar, Tangi and the petitioner executed a mining lease deed dated 25.04.2022 in respect of Damanbhuin Mouza over Plot No. 2161(P) under Khata No. 708, measuring 4.139 hectares or 10.23 acres, Kissam: Gochar, in Tangi Tahasil of District Khordha, commonly known as the Damanbhuin Laterite Stone Quarry.

(iv) In the meantime, on 13.05.2022, the Tahasildar, Tangi granted permission to M/s Agarwala for lifting of ordinary soil or morrum from Plot No. 2161 for the purpose of road construction.

(v) Thereafter, the petitioner was granted the Consent to Establish (CTE) on 29.06.2022 by the Odisha State Pollution Control Board under Section 25 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Section 21 of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 for production of laterite stone of 1500 cubic metres per annum.

(vi) The Consent to Operate was granted to the petitioner on 15.07.2022 and was subsequently renewed on 19.06.2023.

(vii) The petitioner commenced mining operations at the Damanbhuin Stone Quarry in July, 2022. Around this period, it was found that one Yudhistir Udaysingh and one Biswanath Behera, residents of village/P.S. Jankia, were engaged in illegal mining over the leasehold area of the petitioner as well as adjoining areas. The said persons extracted laterite ore without the permission or consent of the petitioner and threatened the petitioner and his employees. Accordingly, the agent of the petitioner submitted a representation dated 23.06.2022 to the Tahasildar, Tangi bringing the illegal mining and theft of minor minerals to his notice. The Tahasildar, Tangi directed the Revenue Inspector, Achyutpur to conduct an enquiry and submit a report.

(viii) Upon enquiry, the Revenue Inspector, Achyutpur submitted a report stating that the allegations made by the petitioner were correct. By letter bearing No. 236 dated 23.06.2022, it was reported that the Geologist had concluded that the said persons had illegally mined 16,324 cubic metres of laterite ore.

(ix) On the basis of the said report, the Tahasildar, Tangi lodged a complaint against Yudhistir Udaysingh and Biswanath Behera at Jankia Police Station, Khordha on 24.06.2022, which was registered as FIR N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top