Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT
KELU CHARAN BEHERA @ KALU @ CHITTARANJAN PATTANAIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G. Satapathy, J.
1. Since the Petitioner herein is an accused in all the three criminal cases of similar nature in Pipili PS Case Nos. 122 of 2025, 123 of 2025 & 124 of 2025 and the allegation in all those three cases disclose a similar pattern of transaction with the Petitioner being a common link, all these three bail applications are heard together and disposed of by this common order with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The Petitioner in these three bail applications U/S.483 of BNSS seeks for grant of bail in connection with Pipili PS Case No.122 of 2025 corresponding to GR Case No.193 of 2025;Pipili PS Case No. 123 of 2025 corresponding to GR Case No. 194 of 2025;and Pipili PS Case No. 124 of 2025 corresponding to GR Case No.195 of 2025 being charge sheeted for commission of offences punishable U/Ss. 336(2)/ 336(3)/ 338/ 339/ 342/ 340(2)/ 319(2)/ 318(4)/ 316(2)/ 61(2)/3(5) of BNS pending in the Court of learned JMFC, Pipili.
3. Facts in precise are that in BLAPL No. 8167 of 2025 which arises out of Pipili PS Case No. 122 of 2025, the informant Pradip Kumar Beuria alleged that acting on the inducement of the Petitioner, he agreed to purchase a pie
Bail may be granted considering severe health conditions, risk of absconding, and presumption of innocence, despite serious allegations of financial fraud.
Bail is granted when the accused has not misused liberty, factors indicate compliance, and the presumption of innocence is upheld; restrictions are imposed to ensure trial cooperation and prevent abs....
Criminal proceedings are not meant for recovery of disputed dues; the presumption of innocence underlies the decision to grant bail when no risk of flight or witness tampering is established.
Bail should not be withheld as a pre-trial punishment – Criminal Court, exercising jurisdiction to grant of bail or anticipatory bail is not expected to act as a recovery agent to realize dues of com....
In serious fraud cases, bail may be denied due to substantial allegations, criminal antecedents, and flight risk, despite long custody periods.
The court determined that bail should be granted to the accused in light of the predominantly civil nature of the dispute and the absence of need for custodial interrogation, emphasizing protection o....
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the completion of investigation, primarily documentary evidence, and the accused's custody for the past year, in line with the principles laid down by ....
Bail should not be denied solely based on the seriousness of the charges; considerations must include the necessity of ensuring the accused's presence at trial and not obstructing justice.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
