SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 766

ORISSA HIGH COURT
MANAGOBINDA MOHARANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim of adjacent land's allotment. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments on entitlement based on expectations. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's acknowledgment of expectations and possession. (Para 8 , 9 , 13)
4. legitimate expectation in public law context. (Para 10 , 11)
5. doctrine of legitimate expectation explained. (Para 12 , 14)
6. direction to authority for a decision. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT :

B.P. Routray, J.

1. Heard Mr. A.P. Bose, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. D. Mohapatra, learned senior counsel for Bhubaneswar Development Authority (BDA) (O.P. No.2), Mr. D. Mohanty, learned counsel for Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation (BMC) (O.P. No.3) and Mr. R. Pradhan, learned ASC for opposite party No.1.

2. The petitioner is the allottee of residential plot No.168 under Kalinga Vihar Housing Scheme (MIG Category). The order of allotment under Annexure-1 was issued on 8th January, 1996.

3. The case of the petitioner is that there is a surplus patch of land behind his plot measuring 40 feet X 52 feet (2080 Sq. Feet) belonging to BDA (O.P. No.2), adjacent to his land and the same is left unused. Accordingly the petitioner made an application in the year 1999 vide Ann

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top