SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 770

ORISSA HIGH COURT
UDAYA SHANKAR MOHAPATRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner is allottee under housing scheme. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments on legitimate expectation for allotment. (Para 4 , 5)
3. acknowledgment of other plot owners' allotment. (Para 6 , 7)
4. joint demarcation confirms land occupation. (Para 8 , 9)
5. legitimate expectation and public authority duties. (Para 10 , 11)
6. expectation arises from prolonged possession. (Para 12 , 13)
7. authority must consider legitimate expectations. (Para 14)
8. judgment directs authority to decide on land allotment. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT :

B.P. Routray, J.

1. Heard Mr. A.P. Bose, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. D. Mohapatra, learned senior counsel for Bhubaneswar Development Authority (BDA) (O.P. No.2), Mr. D. Mohanty, learned counsel for Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation (BMC) (O.P. No.3) and Mr. R. Pradhan, learned ASC for opposite party No.1.

2. The petitioner is the allottee of residential plot No.175 under Kalinga Vihar Housing Scheme (MIG Category). The order of allotment under Annexure-1 was issued on 31st July, 2002.

3. The case of the petitioner is that there is a surplus patch of land behind his plot measuring 40 feet X 39 feet (1560 Sq. Feet) belonging to BDA (O.P. N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top