IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.K. PATTANAIK, J.
M/s. Re-Sustainability Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 1182 of 2024
Decided On : 10-04-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for damages and compensation (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. statutory responsibilities under waste management regulations (Para 3) |
| 3. arbitrariness in actions of the bmc affecting petitioner’s rights (Para 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 4. judicial review of governmental arbitrary actions (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. contractual obligations and public law standards (Para 10 , 11 , 14 , 16) |
| 6. determining claims based on contractual compliance (Para 18 , 19) |
| 7. justification for deductions and penalties imposed (Para 20 , 21) |
| 8. claims for losses not guaranteed under the contract (Para 22 , 23) |
| 9. payment obligations for services rendered (Para 24 , 25) |
| 10. need for fair consideration of claims (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 11. final order directing resolution of claims (Para 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT :
R.K. PATTANAIK, J.
1. Instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the actions of the opposite party (in short, ‘the BMC’) in not abiding by the terms of the Concession Agreement (CA) dated 6th November, 2013 at Annexure-1 is arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India followed by a direction to the BMC to pay damages in the nature of compensation towards the injury caused to it due to such arbitrariness and illegality and realization of Rs.73,25,10,241/- (rupees seventy-three crores twenty-five lacs ten thousand two hundred forty-one) payable as on 30th November, 2023 along with interest, costs and expenses, pendent lite and future interest @ 9% per annum till such realization under the contract with such other reliefs granted on the grounds inter alia that such a direction with appropriate writs/orders to the BMC is necessary in the interest of justice.
2. In fact, the petitioner is aggrieved by the improper conduct and dealings of the BMC for denying it the legitimate contractual claims under the CA and to the contrary having imposed penalties in an arbitrary and unjustified manner and in complete ignorance of the statutory responsibilities assigned under the Odisha Municipal Corporation Act, 2003 (in short, ‘the Act’), Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000 (shortly as ‘the MSW Rules’) and Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 (hence called as ‘the SWM Rules’) qua handling of waste management, more particularly, when it has fulfilled the obligations for the period more than the prescribed time line under Annexure-1. The actions of the BMC, which are alleged to be illegal, are for (i) non-payment of tipping fees with escalated rates;(ii) wrongful deductions of 4% from each monthly bill; (iii) levy of arbitrary penalties contrary to terms of the CA; (iv) unilaterally withholding 20% amount from June 2019 bill for the additional services rendered during the ‘Fani’ cyclone period; (v) arbitrary withholding of consideration qua services rendered during the Covid-19 (2020/21);(vi) denying payment relating to services rendered in relation to MCC works and Kalinga Stadium;(vii) further withholding payment towards tonnage loss incurred upon deployment of NGO vehicles for door-to-door collection; and finally(viii) non-payment of interest claims on delayed receipts.
3. According to the petitioner, it is a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 involved in the business of waste management (Municipal), hazardous and biomedical, and other environment solutions having operational experience of more than 25 years and considered to be a pioneer in the above specialized field and earlier known as Ramky Enviro Engineers Ltd. changed to the present with effect from 10th February, 2022 and has been issued a Certificate of Incorporation as per Annexure-4.
3.1. The Government of India through Ministry of Environment and Forest notified the MSW Rules in exercise of power conferred under Section 3 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986, by virtue of which it was made mandatory for every Municipal Authority to implement a scientific solid waste management system wherein solid wastes are duly collected, transporte
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi & others vs. State of U.P. & others
Suresh Kumar Wadhwa vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. And another vs. Adani Power (Mundra) Ltd. and another
Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. vs. EMTA Coal Ltd. And another
ABL International Ltd. And another vs. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. & others
Joshi Technologies International Inc. vs. Union of India & others
Union of India & others vs. Tantia Construction Pvt. Ltd.
State of Bihar & others vs. Jain Plastics and Chemicals Ltd.
Joshi Technologies International INC. vs. Union of India & others
Union of India & others vs. Puna Hinda
Divisional Forest Officer vs. Biswanath Tea Co. Ltd.
State of U.P. & others vs. Bridge and Roof Company (India) Ltd.
Shiv Dass vs. Union of India & others
Rushibhai Jagdishbhai Pathak vs. Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation
V. Chandrasekaran and another vs. Administrative Officer & others
State actions in contractual relationships must adhere to principles of fairness and non-arbitrariness as mandated by Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Point of Law : Commercial Vehicles - Toll plazas/posts/barriers - Collection of Toll Tax – Whether rights of petitioner is violated - Conduct of parties is governed by the Contract Agreement and the ....
An authority must adhere to contract terms, including timely communication of penalties and an opportunity to rectify, or face quashing of arbitrary demands.
Point of law: Stated simply, 'unjust enrichment' means retention of a benefit by a person that is unjust or inequitable. 'Unjust enrichment' occurs when a person retains money or benefits which in ju....
Parties to a contract must adhere to its terms despite unforeseen circumstances like force majeure, and disputes arising from such a contract should be resolved through contractual mechanisms, not ju....
The power to issue prerogative writs under Article 226 of the Constitution is not limited by any other provisions of the Constitution. The High Court has the discretion to entertain or not to enterta....
The extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court can be exercised in view of the admission made by the 3rd respondent regarding payments to be payable to the petitioner.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.