SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 1086

VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
Sunshine Electricals – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Subba Rao Korrapati, Advocate, Alapati Vivekananda, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents agreed to pass a common order in both the writ petition as well as in contempt case. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to pass a common order in both the writ petition as well as in contempt case.

2. The present writ petition is filed declaring the inaction of the respondents in releasing the payments due to the petitioner concern, as per the directions of the 2nd respondent herein, vide Memo No.24/CPR & RD/LED/2018, dtd. 19/5/2020 and subsequent letter of the 1st respondent vide Letter No.PRR01- PROPPAN(STLT)/5/Pts.III/A2/2020, dtd. 19/8/2020 in respect of the work executed by the petitioner for conversion of existing conventional streetlights into energy efficient LED street lighting system for conservation of energy in Gram Panchayats in Visakhapatnam District, as per agreement dtd. 30/10/2017 with the 3rd respondent-Corporation herein, as illegal and arbitrary.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and learned Standing Counsel for 3rd respondent-Corporation.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 1st respondent took a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top