SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 598

S.S.NIJJAR, HEMANT GUPTA
Gagandeep Kang – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory – Respondent


Judgment

Hemant Gupta, J.

1. This order shall dispose of twenty five writ petitions bearing CWP No. 2074 of 1990 pertaining to pocket No. 1, CWP Nos. 416 of 1990, 15877 of 1989, 16211 of 1990, 8670 of 1990 pertaining to pocket No. 2, CWP Nos. 3325 of 1990, 8881 of 1990, 14058 of 1990, 1034 of 1990, 3422 of 1990 pertaining to pocket No. 3, CWP No,3125 of 1990, pertaining to pocket No. 5 CWP No. 597 of 1990 pertaining to pocket No. 6, CWP Nos. 5250 of 1991, 13116 of 1990 pertaining to pocket No. 9, 2821 of 1992 pertaining to pocket No. 10, CWP Nos. 12595 of 1990, 12596 of 1990, 15095 of 1991, 10145 of 1991, 5724 of 1992, 5103 of 1992, 15117 of 1991 pertaining to pocket No. 1 1, CWP Nos. 765 of 1992/7774 of 1992, 11372 of 1990 pertaining to Kalagram as common questions of law and fact are involved. Pocket Nos. 1 to 6 are part of Scheme No. 2 whereas pocket Nos. 9 to 11 are part of Scheme No. 3.

2. The facts are taken from writ petition No. 2074 of 1990. The writ petitions where the additional points have been raised are also dealt with in this order. On 25.5.3989, Chandigarh Administration published a notification that the land measuring 29.07 acres (Pocket No. 1) is likely to be neede























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top