M.M.KUMAR
Jagdish – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Kumar – Respondent
M.M.Kumar, J.
1. This is tenants petition filed under subsection (6) of Section 15 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 (for brevity the Act) challenging concurrent findings of facts recorded by both the Courts below that the demised premises had become unfit and unsafe for human habitation. These findings have been recorded on issue No. 3 which is the sole issue that survives for consideration before this Court. The findings on Issue No. 3 is based on the report Ex.P-2/A submitted by one Shri Om Parkash, SDO, who made the spot inspection as a Local Commissioner and the statements made by PW-2 Shri Sanjay Kumar, the landlord respondent himself. The analysis of the evidence produced by both the parties has been made by the Appellate Authority, which reads as under:-
"To prove this issue, PW.1 Rajender Singh, Draftsman has proved the site planEx.Pl prepared by him according to the spot on 4.9.1995. 12. PW2 Sanjay Kumar son of Puran has categorically stated that this building was constructed about 70/80 years back and it has outlived its life. He has categorically stated that this building is not fit for human habitation and the stair-case have fallen an
Helper Girdhar Bhai V/s. Saiyed Mohamad Mirasaheb Kadri
Lachhman Dass V/s. Santokh Singh
Rajbir Kaur V/s. Chokosiri And Co.
Sarla Ahuja V/s. United Limited Insurance Co. Ltd.
Shiv Sarup Gupta V/s. Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta
State Of Kerala V/s. K.M. Charia Abdullah And Co.
Bhoop Chand V/s. Kay Pee Cee Investments
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.