IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, JJ.
The Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd., Chandigarh - Appellant
Versus
The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Chandigarh and Others - Respondents
LPA Nos. 1988, 1989, 1990, 2000 of 2013, 2001 of 2013 (O&M), 2006, 2053, 2054, 2055, 2056, 2130 of 2013, 109 of 2014, CWP Nos. 11451, 16322, 3611 and 3641 of 2014
Decided On : 29-07-2019
JUDGMENT :
Rajiv Sharma, J.
Since common questions of law and facts are involved in all these Letters Patent Appeals and Civil Writ Petitions, therefore, these are taken up together and being disposed of by a common judgment.
2. The facts are being taken from Letters Patent Appeal No. 1988 of 2013, instituted against the judgment dated 31.08.2013 rendered by the learned Single Judge, in CWP No. 19915 of 2011 and analogous matters.
3. The brief facts necessary for disposal of these appeals and writ petitions are that the private respondents in LPAs and petitioners in CWPs were employees of the Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Limited, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as "the appellant Bank' for brevity sake). The service conditions of all the employees of the appellant Bank are governed by the Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Land Mortgage Banks Service (Common Cadre) Rules, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as "the Common Cadre Rules' for brevity sake).
4. According to the averments made in the LPAs, the appellant Bank is a registered Cooperative Society. It was earlier known as "Punjab State Cooperative Land Mortgage Bank Ltd.". The principle object of the appellant Bank is to provide long term loans to the farming community and to save them from the clutches of money lenders. The main funding of the appellant Bank is by way of loans from National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development ("NABARD') as per the norms laid down. The appellant-Bank has two tier structure comprising of "Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd." at Apex level (SADB) and the "Primary Agricultural Development Banks" (PADB) at the grass root level. These two banks ensure timely delivery of credit to approximately eight lac farmers, who are its members. The farmers are directly benefited with various schemes which provide long term and short term loans to them.
5. According to the facts enumerated in various appeals and writ petitions, the Department of Finance, Government of Punjab, vide its letter bearing U.O. No. 2368-FD BPE/SA-III-81-Policy-12 dated 22.09.1988, in pursuant to the recommendations of the Punjab Pay Commission to bring the employees serving in various Public Sector Undertakings and State Aided Institutions under the purview of the State Pension Rules, had solicited the views/comments of the concerned organisations to inter-alia communicate the additional financial burden involved in each case and whether the organistion/organisations could bear the additional liability out of their own resources. On 22.06.1989, resolution No. 24 was passed by the Administrator of the appellant Bank as under :-
| Item No. | Agenda | Decision |
| 1(i) | To consider to amend Common Cadre Rules for introducing Pension Scheme. | 1 (i) Resolved that the existing Common Cadre Rule No. 15 be numbered as 15 (i) and a new rule 15 (ii) be incorporated as under : 15 (ii) The Board of Directors may formulate Pension Rule with the approval of RCS Punjab. |
| (ii) | To consider to introduce Pension Scheme for the employees/ officers in the Common Cadre of the Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank | (ii) (a) Resolved that the Pension Scheme for the employees/officers in the Common Cadre of the Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank be introduced for the adoption w.e.f. 1.4.89. (b) It is further resolved that the pension rules enclosed are approved. Any matter which is not specifically mentioned in these Rules shall be governed by Chapter XIII of the Punjab Civil Service Rules Vol. II. (c) It is further resolved that the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Chandigarh be requested to exempt the bank from the payment of contributory provident fund scheme and refund the entire existing contribution with them along with family pens |
T.R. Kapur and others versus State of Haryana and others
P. Mahendran and others versus State of Karnataka and others
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur and others versus State of Maharashtra and others
K. Narayanan and others versus State of Karnataka and others
Chairman Railway Board and others versus C.R. Rangadhamaiah and others
Land Acquisition Officer-cum-DSWO. AP. v. B. V. Reddy and Sons
S.L. Srinivasa Jute Twine Mills (P) Ltd Versus Union of India and Another
U.P. Raghavendra Acharya and Others versus State of Karnataka and Others
Nani Sha and others Versus State of Arunachal Pradesh and others
Zile Singh vs. State of Haryana and Others
MRF Ltd., Kottayam vs. Asstt. Commissioner (Assessment) Sales Tax and Others
Kusumam Hotels Private Limited vs. Kerala State Electricity Board and others
Anil Chandra and others vs. Radha Krishna and others
State of Madhya Pradesh and others vs. Yogendra Shrivastava
N.C. Singhal vs. Director General, Armed Forces Medical Services
K.C. Arora vs. State of Haryana
Shivajirao Nilangekar Patil Vs. Dr. Mahesh Madhav Gosavi and others
B.S. Vadhera v. Union of India
State of J&K v. Triloki Nath Khosla
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.