SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 1038

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, JJ.
Deepak Kumar and Others - Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana and Others - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 19790 of 2019, 19994 of 2019
Decided On : 29-07-2019

Advocates Appeared:
Sunil Kumar Nehra, Adv., Suresh Kumar Kaushik, Adv., Lochan Gupta, Adv.

Headnote:

Rule 10 - Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) - [2008] - The court discussed the validity of Rule 10 of the Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2008, which governs the recruitment to the cadre of Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch). The rule requires applicants to have completed eight years of continuous government service, and the court examined whether employees of Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP)/HUDA and Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board, Panchkula, could be considered government servants under this rule.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged Rule 10 of the Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2008, which required eight years of continuous government service for recruitment to the Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch). They also challenged an order that excluded them from the selection process.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners, working in HSVP/HUDA and Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board, Panchkula, could not be considered government servants under Rule 10. The court held that these institutions are separate entities and their employees do not hold civil posts under the State.

Issues: The issues revolved around the interpretation of Rule 10 of the Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2008, and whether the petitioners could be considered government servants under this rule.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on various precedents to establish that employees of separate entities, such as HSVP/HUDA and Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board, Panchkula, do not hold civil posts under the State and are not entitled to the protection of Article 311 of the Constitution.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitions, upholding the validity of Rule 10 of Haryana Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 2008, and affirming that the petitioners could not be considered government servants under this rule.

JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Sharma, J.

Since common questions of law and facts are involved in the aforesaid two writ petitions, therefore, these are taken up together and disposed of by a common judgment. However, in order to maintain clarity the facts of CWP-19994-2019 have been taken into consideration.

2. The petitioners in CWP-19994-2019 are working as Senior Scale Stenographers and Clerk respectively in Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP)/ HUDA. The petitioners in CWP-19790-2019 are working as Assistant Secretary in Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board, Panchkula.

3. The State of Haryana has framed Rules called Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules' for brevity sake) for recruitment to the cadre of Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch). It reads as under:-

"10. Selection of Candidates for Register A-II. -(1) The Commission shall invite applications from amongst the eligible members of Group-C Service, which shall be submitted to the Commission by the Heads of Departments of Haryana through their Administrative Secretaries in the prescribed Form-I, alongwith summary of Annual Confidential Reports grading and integrity certificates duly signed by the recommending authorities.

(2) The name of only such a member of Group-C Service shall be submitted under the provisions of sub-rule (1) who-

(a) (i) has completed eight years continuous Government Service;

(ii) has not attained the age of fifty years on the first day of November immediately preceding the date of submission of names by the concerned authorities;

(iii) is not facing disciplinary proceedings and against whom action is not being contemplated; and

(iv) is clear from vigilance angle;

(b) is a Graduate from a recognized University."

4. The Chief Secretary has sent a communication to the Secretary, Haryana Public Service Commission, Panchkula, on 30.05.2019 informing him that the State Government had decided to fill up 18 vacancies of HCS (Executive Branch) from Register A-II of members of Group 'C' Service of the year 2019 as per Rule 10 of Haryana Civil Service (Executive Branch), Rules, 2008. The petitioners also wanted to participate in the selection process. They submitted their applications. The Chief Administrator, HSVP, Panchkula, forwarded the applications of the petitioners in CWP-19994-2019, on 27.06.2019. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government of Haryana, Irrigation and Farmer Welfare Department had sent communication dated 03.07.2019 to the Chief Administrator, Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board informing him that the proposal sent by him was not covered as per the instructions issued by the Chief Secretary to Government of Haryana on 24.06.2019, in CWP-19790-2019. It is in these circumstances the present writ petitions have been filed.

5. The petitioners have challenged Rule 10 of the Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2008 amended on 04.01.2019 to the extent that the service rendered in Board / Corporation by the employees is not being counted as 8 years continuous government service and also for quashing the order dated 03.07.2019.

6. The recruitment to the Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) is governed under the Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2008. The amendment was carried out in the Rules on 04.01.2019 as quoted hereinabove. It is evident from the language employed in Rule 10 that the Commission is required to invite applications from amongst the eligible members of Group-C Service, which are to be submitted to the Commission by the Heads of Departments of Haryana through their Administrative Secretaries in the prescribed Form-I, along with summary of Annual Confidential Reports, grading and integrity certificates. The names of only such members of Group 'C' services are required to be submitted under the provision of sub rule (i) who have completed eight years continuous Government Service and (ii) have not attained the age of fifty years on the first date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top