Back
LISA GILL
Jindal Rectifiers – Appellant
Versus
Jindal Power – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Lisa Gill, J. - Plaintiff-Appellant has filed this appeal being aggrieved of order dated 29.08.2019, whereby its application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC read with Section 151 CPC has been dismissed.
2. Brief facts of the case are that appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction alleging infringement of trademark, dilution of goodwill, unfair competition and rendition of accounts of profits/damages, against the respondents-defendants no.1 and 2, restraining them from using any trademark deceptively similar to the registered trademark of plaintiff or any other mark/name having 'M/s. Jindal' domain name and/or in any manner whatsoever in respect of any infringement or passing of goods of defendants as goods of the plaintiff. The suit was initially filed against the three defendants. One of the defendants i.e. defendant no.3 Satish Kumar, Proprietor of 'Jindal Transformer Industries' appeared and suffered a statement that he had surrendered his GST number before the Goods and Services Department, which was in the name of M/s. Jindal Transformer Industries. He further stated that he would not use the name of 'M/s. Jindal Transformer Industries' or 'M/s Jindal' for
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's consideration of deceptive similarity of trademarks, acquisition of distinctiveness and secondary meaning of a name, and the use of a s....
The court established that the rights of the prior user of a trademark are superior to those of a subsequent user, emphasizing the elements of goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage in passing off c....
Section 35 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 protects bonafide use of one's own name or surname in business, emphasizing the need for honesty and bonafide intentions in using a surname as a trademark.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that in cases of trademark infringement, the likelihood of confusion and deception among the public must be supported by evidence. The court emp....
The court emphasized the importance of weighing the interests of contesting parties and the limited scope for interference with the trial court's discretion in granting or refusing temporary injuncti....
The combination of common words can be distinctive and unique as a trade mark, and the appellate forum has a limited role and cannot entertain new issues or documents at the appellate stage.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
