AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Yuvraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Amol Rattan Singh, J.
Vide this petition, the petitioner seeks to invoke the jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash FIR no.0115, dated 14.02.2021, registered at Police Station Hansi, District Hansi, wherein it is alleged that offences punishable under Sections 153-A and 153-B of the IPC, as also Section 3 (1)(u) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), have been committed. [Subsequently, as submitted before this court, an offence punishable under Section 3(1)(s) of the Act has also been added in the FIR.]
The grounds spelt out in the petition for quashing the FIR, can be essentially summed up as follows:-
(ii) That respondent no.2 has no locus standi to register the FIR as the word in question (bhangi) as was used by the petitioner, was neither directed at him nor at any other member of the dalit community; and therefore the motive of the said respondent, in getting the FIR register
State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi
State of Karnataka v. L. Muni Swami and others
Balwant Singh v. State of Punjab
Manzar Sayeed Khan v. State of Maharashtra and another
Inder Mohan Goswami and another v. State of Uttranchal and others
Manju Devi vs. Onkarjit Singh Ahluwalia
Ishwar Pratap Singh & Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another
Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra
Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra
Union of India vs. State of Maharashtra
Amish Devgan vs. Union of India
M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.