VIVEK PURI
Naveen – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vivek Puri, J. (Oral). - Petitioners have approached this Court by way of instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. invoking its inherent jurisdiction for quashing of FIR No.18 dated 12.03.2015 under Sections 323/498-A/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Women, District Sonepat and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise.
2. On 26.04.2022, parties were directed to appear before the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate and get their statements recorded with regard to the compromise arrived at between them.
3. The trial Court was directed to record the statements of all the concerned and send its report regarding genuineness and voluntary nature of the compromise.
4. In compliance of the order dated 26.04.2022, learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonepat has recorded the statements of the parties and submitted the report, the relevant para whereof reads as under:-
'As per statement of complainant Reena, she has compromised the matter with the accused namely Naveen Kumar, Ramdhari and Murti Devi without any pressure from any quarter. She has no objection if the FIR No.18 dated 12.03.2015 under Sections 323, 34 and 498-A IPC, Women Polic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.