Deepak Kumar vs State of Haryana - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 1166

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1166

SUMEET GOEL
Deepak Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Vaibhav Kumar, Advocate; For the Petitioner (Through VC).
Ms. Mahima Yashpal, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 (Through VC).

JUDGMENT

Sumeet Goel, J.

By way of present petition, the petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No.158 dated 18.11.2020 under Sections 498A, 376, 377, 323, 506, 34 of IPC, registered at Women Police Station, Faridabad, District Faridabad and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding dated 17.05.2023 (Annexure P-4), which is stated to have been effected between the parties.

2. On 14.03.2024, the following order was passed:

"(The case has been taken up through Video Conferencing)

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking quashing of FIR (Annexure P-2) and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of a compromise having been effected between the parties.

The parties are directed to get their statements recorded qua the factum of compromise in the following manner:

(i) The petitioner shall appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate concerned on 20.03.2024 or any date thereafter as fixed by trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording statement of the petitioner as well as of the complainant qua the factum of compromise. As and when any such appearance is made, the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate shall do the need