SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 978

VIKAS BAHL
Sombir – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. S.S. Nain, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Parveen Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana., for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral) - This order will dispose of two petitions. The first petition has been filed by Sombir i.e. CRM-M-7892-2022 and the second petition has been filed by Harsh alias Hitesh i.e. CRM-M-13053-2022.

2. Both the said petitions have been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the grant of regular bail to the petitioners in FIR No.277 dated 11.03.2020, under Sections 148, 149, 186, 307, 323, 324, 332, 353, 201, 506 and 120-B IPC and Section 25-54-59 of the Arms Act, at Police Station City, Sonepat.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that as per the FIR, petitioner Harsh alias Hitesh has not been named in the FIR and as per the FIR, even petitioner Sombir was called only subsequently, after there was a dispute between the complainant party and the persons who were sitting there and were stopped by the complainant party from having liquor. It is submitted that a perusal of the FIR would show that it was a case of sudden fight. It is further submitted that although, as per the case of the prosecution, there are allegations against the petitioners that they had given stab wounds to the injured Suraj and Ram Chander, but the petitioners have been in cus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top