SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1123

RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Jaspal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. J.S. Chahal, Advocate for the Petitioner.; Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, A.A.G., Punjab.; Mr. Munish Khangwal, Advocate for the Complainant.

JUDGMENT

Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) - Matter has been taken up through video conferencing via Webex facility in the light of the Pandemic Covid-19 situation and as per instructions.

2. The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C seeking the benefit of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.303 dated 8.11.2019 under sections 306, 34, 2011.P.C (Section 304-B I.P.C was added later on), registered at Police Station, Dera Bassi, District S.A.S Nagar.

3. As per factual matrix, the FIR in question was lodged by Gurmukh Singh son of Gurbachan Singh. It was alleged that he had one son namely Gurpreet Singh aged about 21 years and elder to him is the daughter namely Harmanpreet Kaur aged about 25 years. Marriage of his daughter Harmanpreet Kaur was solemnized about 3 years back with Jaspal Singh i.e. the present petitioner. After the marriage they were blessed with a daughter aged about 2 years. His son-in-law, Kuram and Kurmani used to harass her daughter and she used to remain upset. His son-in-law neither allowed hisdaughter to talk to them nor allowed her to meet them. He neither allowed her to purchase a mobile phone nor allowed her to keep the mobile phone given by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top