SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1123

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Rajesh Bhardwaj, J.
Jaspal Singh - Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRM-M-28178-2020
Decided On : 10-02-2022

Advocates:
Mr. J.S. Chahal, Advocate for the Petitioner.; Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, A.A.G., Punjab.; Mr. Munish Khangwal, Advocate for the Complainant.

The need for complete evidence evaluation before concluding on the case under Section 304-B I.P.C.

Headnote:

Regular Bail - Section 304-B I.P.C - [306, 34, 2011.P.C, 304-B I.P.C] - The court discussed the allegations of harassment and demand of dowry against the petitioner under Section 304-B I.P.C. It highlighted the contradictory statements of the complainant and the need for complete evidence evaluation before concluding on the case under Section 304-B I.P.C. The court allowed the petition for regular bail without making any observation on the merits of the case.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought regular bail in a case involving the death of his wife and daughter within 7 years of marriage, with allegations of harassment and demand of dowry.

Finding of the Court:

The court refrained from commenting on the merits of the case and allowed the petition for regular bail based on the totality of facts and circumstances.

Issues: Allegations of harassment and demand of dowry, contradictory statements of the complainant, sufficiency of evidence for evaluating the case under Section 304-B I.P.C.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for complete evidence evaluation before concluding on the case under Section 304-B I.P.C and refrained from making any observation on the merits of the case.

Final Decision: The petition for regular bail was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be enlarged on bail, subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

JUDGMENT

Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) - Matter has been taken up through video conferencing via Webex facility in the light of the Pandemic Covid-19 situation and as per instructions.

2. The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C seeking the benefit of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.303 dated 8.11.2019 under sections 306, 34, 2011.P.C (Section 304-B I.P.C was added later on), registered at Police Station, Dera Bassi, District S.A.S Nagar.

3. As per factual matrix, the FIR in question was lodged by Gurmukh Singh son of Gurbachan Singh. It was alleged that he had one son namely Gurpreet Singh aged about 21 years and elder to him is the daughter namely Harmanpreet Kaur aged about 25 years. Marriage of his daughter Harmanpreet Kaur was solemnized about 3 years back with Jaspal Singh i.e. the present petitioner. After the marriage they were blessed with a daughter aged about 2 years. His son-in-law, Kuram and Kurmani used to harass her daughter and she used to remain upset. His son-in-law neither allowed hisdaughter to talk to them nor allowed her to meet them. He neither allowed her to purchase a mobile phone nor allowed her to keep the mobile phone given by them. In the morning at 6.30 AM he received a call from some neighbor of his daughter Harmanpreet Kaur that his daughter along with her daughter Jaspreet Kaur had poured kerosine oil and committed suicide. They reached the matrimonial home of their daughter and found the dead bodies of his daughter and grand daughter. FIR was lodged to take legal action against the culprits.

4. Petitioner being the husband of the deceased was arrested on 8.11.2019. He approached learned Addl. Sessions Judge, S.A.S Nagar Mohali for grant of bail, however, after hearing the parties, the same was declined vide order dated 9.9.2020. Aggrieved by the same petitioner has approached this court for grant of bail.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently contends that from the bare perusal of the FIR no case under Section 304-B I.P.C is made out against the petitioner. Counsel submits that though an unnatural death has taken place within 7 years of the marriage, however, the same is not on account of harassment or demand of dowry. Counsel submits that the only allegation in the FIR is that petitioner being husband never allowed the deceased to keep the mobile phone and further never allowed her to meet her parents. It is submitted that primarily the allegations in the FIR are not sufficient even to make out a case under Section 304-B I.P.C as the alleged harassment is not on account of the demand of dowry. It is submitted that thereafter in a deliberated manner a supplementary statement of complainant was recorded and the allegations pertaining to demand of dowry were clandestinely incorporated. Counsel submits that the complainant hasalready been examined by the Trial Court as PW-1, however, a complete reading of his deposition before the Trial Court shows that though he has not been declared hostile, however, he has not even supported the case of the prosecution in toto. It is submitted that in all there are 3 accused and rest of the 2 accused i.e. parents of the petitioner are already on bail. Counsel submits that the petitioner is behind bars for the last more than 2 years and as the material witness already stands examined he deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6. Learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner tooth and nail and submits that there are categoric allegations against the petitioner and he cannot wriggle out of the same. Counsel submits that though the allegations regarding demand of dowry in the FIR were not in the initial version of the complainant, however, in the supplementary statement it was clarified that complainant was nervous on the date of occurrence and hence the allegations to that effect could not be incorporated. Counsel further submits that petitioner is husband of the deceased and the of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top