ARCHANA PURI
Kanishka Narang – Appellant
Versus
Harbhajan Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Archana Puri, J. - The matter has been taken up through video conferencing in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. These are six appeals filed to challenge the Award dated 17.12.2012. Vide this Award, four claim petitions, which were consolidated, vide order dated 27.10.2009, were disposed of. Claim petitions No.116, 117 and 118 relate to deaths of Rajneesh Narang, Sonia Narang and Tanisha Narang respectively, whereas, claim petition No.119, relate to injuries sustained by Kanishka Narang, in a motor vehicular accident.
FAOs No.2350, 2351 and 2352 of 2013 have been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation, vis-a-vis, deaths of aforesaid three persons and also FAO No.4529 of 2013 has been filed for seeking enhancement of compensation, vis-a-vis, injuries sustained by Kanishka Narang, in a motor vehicular accident.
3. However, FAOs No.4282 and 4283 of 2013 have been filed by the Insurance Company, thereby, asserting that compensation qua deaths of Rajneesh Narang and Sonia Narang, have been wrongly worked upon on higher side.
4. For the convenience of discussion, the parties are referred to as claimants and respondents, as making appearance before the learned
Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram & Ors.
R.K.Malik and another vs. Kiran Pal and others
National Insurance Company Limited vs. Farzana and others
Puttama and others vs. K.L.Narayana Reddy and another
R.K.Malik and another vs. Kiran Pal and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.