ANOOP CHITKARA
Suresh Seth – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Director, Directorate Enforcement Jalandhar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. -
Complaint No.
Dated
Pending in Court
Sections
ECIR/03/JLZO /2017
-
Special Court, CBI at SAS Nagar Mohali in case No.COMA/03/2021 in CRAPBSA01-007931-2021 dated 22.09.2021.
44 and 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 as defined u/s 3 R/w Section 70 and punishable u/s 4 of the PMLA Act 2002.
1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 439 CrPC seeking regular bail.
2. In paragraph 45 of the bail petition, the accused declares that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner.
3. Since the main accused-Vikram Kumar Seth was granted regular bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.03.2022 passed in CRM-M-35565-2021 and the said order was never assailed by the respondent before the Supreme Court, case of the petitioner is squarely covered on the grounds of parity, as such there would be no ground for rejecting the bail subject to complying with the conditions mentioned in this order.
4. The Directorate of Enforcement'
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.