SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1386

ANOOP CHITKARA
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.S. Malik, Advocate, Manish Bansal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J. -

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

210

24.04.2022

City Jind, District Jind (Haryana)

148, 149, 323, 365, 379-B, 114, 342, 506 IPC and 25/30 of Arms Act

1. The petitioner, incarcerating upon his arrest in the FIR captioned above, came up before this Court under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking bail.

2. In paragraph 16 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.

3. Petitioner's counsel has drawn attention of this court to the order dated 11.11.2022 passed in CRM-M-42396-2022 (Annexure P-2), vide which the co-accused was granted bail by this court. Counsel for petitioner claims bail on the grounds of parity and does not press on merits.

4. State does not dispute the fact that the allegations against the petitioner are more severe than co accused who was granted bail.

REASONING:

5. The allegations against the petitioner are that he along with other co accused kidnapped the petitioner and gave beatings to him. As per paragraph 13 of the petition the petitioner is i

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top