JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J. -

1. The petitioner, incarcerating upon his arrest in the FIR captioned above, came up before this Court under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking bail.

2. In paragraph 9 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.

3. Petitioner's counsel has drawn attention of this court to bail order of similarly placed co-accused CRM-M-33571-2022 passed by this court. Counsel for petitioner claims bail on the grounds of parity and does not press on merits.

4. State does not dispute the fact that the allegations against the petitioner are not more severe than co accused who was granted bail.

REASONING:

5. The petitioner is in custody since 21.04.2022. Perusal of the order dated 23.08.2022 vide which similarly placed co accused was granted bail covers petitioner's case on the grounds of parity for the reasons that they are identically placed. It is appropriate to reproduce paragraph 6 of this order.

' 6. The allegations clearly reveal that it was the complainant party who had chased the accused. Thus it is improba