SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 24

ANOOP CHITKARA
Malkeet Singh @ Kala – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.S. Sodhi, Advocate, Aditya Kapoor, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J. -

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

04

10.01.2021

Cantt Ferozepur, Distt. Ferozepur

21, 23, 29,61/85 of NDPS Act

1. The petitioner incarcerated for violating the above-mentioned provisions of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) per the FIR captioned above, on the allegations of possessing 100 grams of heroin, has come up before this Court under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail on the ground that the quantity of contraband is less than commercial and rigours of S. 37 of NDPS Act do not apply.

2. In paragraph 16 of the bail application, the accused declares the criminal antecedents, which have been mentioned in Annexure P-6, the order of rejection of bail.

Sr. No.

FIR No.

Date

Offences

Police Station

1

122

03.10.2021

21/29/61/85 of NDPS Act

Special Task Force Phase-4, Mohali

3. Petitioner's counsel prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions. The petitioner contends that the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.

4. While o

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top