ANOOP CHITKARA
Rana Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. -
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 149 | 20.07.2020 | Dirba, District Sangrur | 22 and 29 of NDPS Act |
1. The petitioner incarcerated for violating the above-mentioned provisions of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) per the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking bail on the ground that the quantity of contraband is less than commercial and rigours of S. 37 of NDPS Act do not apply.
2. In paragraph 13 of the bail application, the accused declares the following criminal antecedents:
| Sr. No. | FIR No. | Dated | Offences | Police Station |
| 1. | 22 | 18.02.2020 | 22 of NDPS Act | Dirba, District Sangrur |
In paragraph 13, it is mentioned that there is one more FIR against the petitioner registered under the NDPS Act, but the detail of the said case is not available as the petitioner is confined in jail.
3. The petitioner contends that the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.
4. While opposing the bail, the St
Dataram Singh v State of Uttar Pradesh
Gudikanti Narasimhulu v Public Prosecutor
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v State of Punjab
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav
Maulana Mohd Amir Rashadi v. State of U.P.
Prahlad Singh Bhati v NCT, Delhi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.