SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1376

ANOOP CHITKARA
Rana Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.S. Sekhon, Advocate, Virat Rana, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J. -

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

149

20.07.2020

Dirba, District Sangrur

22 and 29 of NDPS Act

1. The petitioner incarcerated for violating the above-mentioned provisions of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) per the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking bail on the ground that the quantity of contraband is less than commercial and rigours of S. 37 of NDPS Act do not apply.

2. In paragraph 13 of the bail application, the accused declares the following criminal antecedents:

Sr. No.

FIR No.

Dated

Offences

Police Station

1.

22

18.02.2020

22 of NDPS Act

Dirba, District Sangrur

In paragraph 13, it is mentioned that there is one more FIR against the petitioner registered under the NDPS Act, but the detail of the said case is not available as the petitioner is confined in jail.

3. The petitioner contends that the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.

4. While opposing the bail, the St

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top