ANOOP CHITKARA
Ravinder Singh @ Ravi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
16 | 01.04.2022 | Kahnuwal, District Gurdaspur | 18(b), 27(a) of the NDPS Act, 1985 |
1. The petitioner under arrest for violating the provisions as mentioned above of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), per the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail on the ground that the quantity of contraband is less than commercial and rigours of S. 37 of NDPS Act do not apply.
2. In paragraph 7 of the bail application, the accused declares the following criminal antecedents:
Sr. No. | FIR No. | Date | Offences | Police Station |
1. | 93 | 11.06.2017 | 15 of NDPS Act | Division No.2, Distt. Pathankot |
2. | 74 | 22.06.2021 | 323, 324, 325, 326, 427, 34 IPC | Bengowal, Distt, Kapurthala |
3. | 130 | 27.10.2021 | 15 of NDPS and Sections 420, 482, 467, 468, 471 IPC | Bhogpur, Distt. Jalandhar |
3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.
4. While opposing the bail, Ld. counsel representing the State contends that given the criminal past, the accused is likely to indulge in crime once released on bail.
REASONING:
5. In Maulana Mohd Amir Ra
Dataram Singh v State of Uttar Pradesh
GudikantiNarasimhulu v Public Prosecutor
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v State of Punjab
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav
Maulana Mohd Amir Rashadi vs. State of U.P.
Prahlad Singh Bhati v NCT, Delhi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.