JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Harnek Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jagmohan Bansal, J. -
CRM-1703-2023
2. Application for placing on record Annexure A-1, is allowed, in view of the averments made in the application, duly supported by affidavit. Said document is taken on record. Office to append the same at appropriate place.
CRM stands disposed of.
CRM-M-53628-2021
3. The petitioners through instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., on the basis of compromise, are seeking quashing of FIR No.216, dated 20.06.2020, under Sections 406 and 498A of IPC, registered at Police Station PS Sadar Fazilka, District Fazilka, (Annexure P-1), and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Learned State counsel on instruction from Investigating Officer and learned counsel for respondent No.2 submitted that they have no objection if FIR and consequent proceedings in view of compromise are quashed.
5. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that marriage between petitioner and respondent No.2 stands dissolved.
6. Relying upon its earlier judgments in 'Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others, (2012) 10 SCC 303' and 'The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others (2019) 5 SCC 688', a two Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 'R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.