SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 68

ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Guddi Devi @ Guddi – Appellant
Versus
Radhey Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K. Ganga, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anupinder Singh Grewal, J. - Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he is confining the prayer in this petition to expeditious decision of the application preferred by them for injunction. He also submits that the suit along with the application for injunction is pending adjudication for quite some time.

Heard.

2. In view of the limited prayer of the petitioners, the petition is disposed of, without any notice to the respondents, directing the trial Court to consider and decide the application for injunction within a period of three months from now. Till then, the parties shall maintain status quo over the suit land.

3. In the event of the respondents being aggrieved of this order, they would be at liberty to prefer an application.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top