SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1410

AVNEESH JHINGAN
ASI Sukhdev Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate, Arun Luthra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Avneesh Jhingan, J. - This is a petition seeking regular bail in case of FIR No.16 dated 13.10.2022, under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Amendment Act, 2018), registered at Police Station Vigilance Bureau, Bathinda, District Bathinda.

2. The brief facts are that the FIR was registered at the instance of Des Raj. It was alleged that petitioner posted as ASI demanded illegal gratification for presenting the challan in FIR No. 328 dated 12.12.2020, under Sections 325, 323, 341, 452, 148, 149 IPC registered at Police Station City Malout. He had accepted part payment of illegal gratification. To support his case, complainant produced an audio recording.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that it is a case of false implication to pressurize the petitioner to act as per the whims and fancies of complainant in the FIR. The contention is that the petitioner is in custody since 13.10.2022. Investigation is complete. Challan stands presented. The petitioner has given his voice sample.

4. Learned State counsel on instructions opposes the prayer but is not disputing the fact that investigation is complete, voice sample has been taken and petitioner is not invo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top