IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harkesh Manuja, J.
Amarjit Singh - Appellant
Versus
Salwinder Singh - Respondent
CR. No. 4565 of 2022(0&M)
Decided On : 29-10-2022
Rent Authority - Punjab Rent Act, 1995 - Section 24, Section 38(7)(e), Section 50(5) - The court set aside the order declining leave to contest and directing the tenant to vacate the premises, granting the tenant the opportunity to file a review within 10 days as provided by Section 38(7)(e) of the Act. The court also noted that the impugned order could have been challenged before the appellate authority under Section 50(5), but due to the peculiar facts and lack of opposition from the respondent-landlord, the court deemed it appropriate to set aside the order and grant the tenant the opportunity to avail his statutory right.
Fact of the Case:
The respondent/landlord filed a petition under Section 24 of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995 seeking ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from the tenanted premises. The Rent Authority declined the petitioner-tenant's leave to contest and passed an order of eviction.
Finding of the Court:
The court set aside the impugned order, granting the petitioner-tenant the opportunity to file a review within 10 days as provided by the Act. The court noted that the impugned order could have been challenged before the appellate authority, but due to the peculiar facts and lack of opposition from the respondent-landlord, the court deemed it appropriate to set aside the order and grant the tenant the opportunity to avail his statutory right.
Issues: The main issue was the denial of leave to contest and the order of eviction by the Rent Authority.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Rent Authority committed an error of law by passing a composite order of declining leave to contest and directing the tenant to vacate the premises, thereby taking away the statutory right/remedy available to the petitioner-tenant. The court also noted that the impugned order could have been challenged before the appellate authority under the Act.
Final Decision: The present revision petition was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, granting the petitioner the opportunity to file a review within 10 days as provided by the Act.
JUDGMENT
Harkesh Manuja, J. (Oral) - By way of present revision petition challenge has been laid to an order dated 30.08.2022 passed by the Rent Authority (NRI Cases), Jalandhar, whereby, prayer for leave to contest made by the petitionertenant has been declined and simultaneously order of eviction has been passed directing him to vacant the premises in question within a period of three months.
2. Brief facts of the case are that a petition under Section 24 of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was filed at the instance of respondent/landlord seeking ejectment of petitioner-tenant from the tenanted premises i.e. shop/property being part of House No.357, Dashmesh Nagar, Hoshiarpur Road, Rama Mandi, Tehsil and District Jalandhar.
3. On notice, an application for leave to contest was filed at the instance of petitioner-tenant. It is the said application, which has been dismissed by the learned Rent Authority (NRI Cases), Jalandhar, by passing the impugned order dated 30.08.2022, which has now been challenged by way of present revision petition.
4. Notice of motion.
5. At this stage, Mr. A.P.S.Rehan, Advocate, appears on behalf of caveator/respondent-landlord and submits that he is ready with his arguments and as such, the matter is being heard today on merits.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner, relying upon Section 38(7)(e) of the Act submits that the Rent Authority has committed an error of law while passing a composite order of declining his leave to contest besides directing him to vacate the tenanted-premises. He submits that as an effect of the composite impugned order, a statutory right available to him under Clause-(e) to Sub-Section 7 of Section 38 of the Act of filing review before the Rent Authority within a period of 10 days of denial of leave to contest has been taken away. Clause-(e) to Sub-Section 7 of Section 38 of the Act is reproduced for reference:
' where the leave to contest under clause? is denied to the tenant he may file an application for review before the Rent authority within ten days of such denial and the Rent Authority shall endeavour to dispose of such application within seven days of its filing. '
7. In this regard, learned counsel for the petitioner also relies upon an order dated 22.08.2022 passed by this Court in Civil Revision No.2117 of 2022 (O&M).
8. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent/landlord relies upon sub-Section 5 of Section 50 of the Act so as to contend that 'every order or decision of rent authority' under the Act is appealable and an appeal shall lie to the Appellate Authority wherein both the question of law and facts except orders or decision of the Rent Authority made under Section 21 of Section 33 of the Act could be assailed. Sub-Section 5 of Section 50 of the Act is reproduced below for reference:
'an appeal shall lie to the Appellate Authority from every order or decision of Rent Authority made under this Act both on question of law and facts:
Provided that no appeal shall lie against an order or decision of the Rent Authority made under Section 21 or Section 33 of this Act. '
9. I have heard, learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper book as well as the relevant provisions referred to by the respective counsel.
10. Considering the submissions made on behalf of both the parties, I am of the view that by passing a composite order of declining leave to contest besides directing the petitioner-tenant to handover vacant possession to the respondent-landlord simultaneously, the learned Rent Authority committed an error of law. A perusal of Clause-(e) to SubSection 7 of Section 38 of the Act, provides an opportunity to tenant to file an application for review before the Rent Authority within a period of 10 days from the date of denial of leave to contest which, rent Authority is enjoined to dispose of within a period of 7 days of its filing. As a result of passing of composite order, the statutory right/remedy available to peti
The court emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory rights and remedies available to the parties under the Punjab Rent Act, 1995, and ensured that the petitioner-tenant was granted the oppor....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.