SURESHWAR THAKUR
Satnam Singh @ Sattu – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SURESHWAR THAKUR , J.
1. Since both the appeals (supra) arise from a common verdict, made by the learned trial Judge concerned, hence both are amenable for a common verdict being made thereons.
2. Both the appeals (supra) are directed against a common verdict of conviction, made on 12.8.2021, against the convicts-appellants, upon Sessions case No. 199 of 22.4.2019, thus by the learned Sessions Judge, Amritsar. Through the above said verdict, the learned trial Judge concerned, convicted the accused, for the commission of offence punishable, under Section 379-B read with Section 34 of the IPC. Moreover, through a separate sentencing order of even date, the learned trial Judge concerned, sentenced the convicts to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six years, for an offence punishable under Section 379-B read with Section 34 of the IPC, besides also imposed, upon the convicts sentence of fine, comprised in a sum of Rs. 10,000/- each, and, in default of payment of fine amount, she sentenced the convicts to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months. However, both the convicts were acquitted of the charge framed against them qua commission of an offence p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.