SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 2112

SURESHWAR THAKUR
Ashish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. H.N.Sahu, Advocate for appellant No. 1. (in CRA-S-1571-2019). Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Advocate for appellant No. 2. (in CRA-S-1571-2019). Mr. Suresh Kumar Kaushik, Advocate for the appellant (in CRA-S-1681-2019) Mr. Sumit Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

JUDGMENT

Sureshwar Thakur, J. - Through a judgment, drawn on 07.3.2019, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar, upon Sessions Case No. 18 of 2017, in respect of the charges drawn against the accused under Sections 307, 323, 506, 452 read with Section 34 of the IPC, he proceeded to convict the accused. Moreover, vide a separate sentencing order, drawn on 13.3.2019, the learned trial Court, proceeded to impose the hereinafter extracted sentence(s) of imprisonment, and, also sentences of fine, upon the convictaccused.

Sr. No.

Offence under Section

Imprisonment

Fine

In default of payment of fine

1.

307/34IPC

Rigorous imprisonment for seven years.

Rs. 5,000/-

Further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 1 year.

2.

323/34 IPC

Rigorous imprisonment for one year.

Rs. 1,000/-

Further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 days.

3.

452/34 IPC

Rigorous imprisonment for three years.

Rs. 1,000/-

Further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 months.

4.

506 IPC

Rigorous imprisonment for three years

Rs. 1,000/-

Further undergo rigor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top