Hakam Singh vs State Of Punjab - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 138

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 138

SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Hakam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Gurmeet Singh Saini, for Mr. Balraj Singh Sidhu, Advocate (legal aid counsel)
For the Respondent: Ms. Monika Jalota

JUDGMENT :

SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.

1. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mansa through a verdict drawn on 28.07.2017, upon case SC No. 5 of 08.08.2014 proceeded to, in respect of charges drawn against, both the accused, for offences punishable under Sections 302/201/34 IPC, hence made a verdict of conviction, upon, the convicts. Moreover, through a separate sentencing order drawn on 28.07.2017, the learned trial Judge concerned, proceeded to make the hereinafter extracted sentence(s) upon the convicts.

Name of the convict	Section	Sentence	Fine	In default
Hakam Singh	302 IPC	Rigorous Imprisonment for life	Rs.10,000/-	Two months Rigorous Imprisonment
Hakam Singh	201 IPC	Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years	Rs.5,000/-	One month Rigorous Imprisonment
Bawa Singh	302 IPC	Rigorous Imprisonment for life	Rs.10,000/-	Two months Rigorous Imprisonment
Bawa Singh	201 IPC	Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years.	Rs.5,000/-	One month Rigorous Imprisonment

2. The convicts become aggrieved from the verdict of conviction (supra), and, also

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(P&H) 138

SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARIHakam Singh – AppellantVersusState Of Punjab – Respondent

SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Hakam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent