JUDGMENT :

SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.

1. Since both the above appeals arise from a common verdict of conviction, and, consequent thereto sentence(s), as, made by the learned trial Judge concerned, thus both are amenable for a common verdict being made thereons.

2. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Palwal, through a verdict drawn on 6.9.2018, upon case bearing No. 08 of 2016, thus recorded a finding of conviction against appellants-accused Subedeen, Farukh, and Farmuddin @ Fammu, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 354-A, 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. However, appellant-accused Samina was convicted for the commission of an offence under Section 302/34 of the IPC. In addition, the other co-accused, namely, Aslam, Hakmuddin and Sakmuddin were acquitted of the charges framed against them. Moreover, through a separate sentencing order drawn on 12.9.2018, the learned trial Judge concerned, sentenced all the convicts-appellants to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life, for a charge drawn for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the IPC, besides also imposed, upon the convicts sentence of fine, comprised in a sum of Rs. 25,000/- each. In default of payment of