IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI, JJ.
Farukh and others - Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana - Respondent
CRA-D-1028-DB-2018 (O&M)
Decided on : 25-07-2023
Conviction - Offences under Sections 354-A, 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC - Summary of Acts and Sections: IPC Section 354-A, IPC Section 302, IPC Section 34 - The court affirmed the verdict of conviction against the appellants for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 354-A, 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The court also maintained the sentences of imprisonment and fine imposed upon the convicts-appellants.
Fact of the Case:
The appeals arose from a common verdict of conviction against the appellants for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 354-A, 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The prosecution case involved a quarrel leading to the death of a person, with the accused being convicted and sentenced by the trial Judge.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the impugned verdict of conviction and the consequent sentences imposed upon the convicts-appellants did not merit any interference and thus dismissed both the appeals. The court maintained the verdict of conviction and the sentences imposed by the trial Judge.
Issues: The issues involved the appeal against the verdict of conviction and the consequent sentences imposed upon the convicts-appellants for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 354-A, 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the evidence provided by the eye witnesses, medical reports, and the valid disclosure statements made by the convicts supported the prosecution's version. The court concluded that all the members of the unlawful assembly were vicariously liable for the murder of the deceased and thus affirmed the verdict of conviction and the sentences imposed upon the convicts-appellants.
Final Decision: The court dismissed both the appeals, maintained the verdict of conviction, and affirmed the sentences imposed upon the convicts-appellants. The court ordered the execution of the sentences and directed the case property to be dealt with in accordance with the law.
JUDGMENT :
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.
1. Since both the above appeals arise from a common verdict of conviction, and, consequent thereto sentence(s), as, made by the learned trial Judge concerned, thus both are amenable for a common verdict being made thereons.
2. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Palwal, through a verdict drawn on 6.9.2018, upon case bearing No. 08 of 2016, thus recorded a finding of conviction against appellants-accused Subedeen, Farukh, and Farmuddin @ Fammu, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 354-A, 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. However, appellant-accused Samina was convicted for the commission of an offence under Section 302/34 of the IPC. In addition, the other co-accused, namely, Aslam, Hakmuddin and Sakmuddin were acquitted of the charges framed against them. Moreover, through a separate sentencing order drawn on 12.9.2018, the learned trial Judge concerned, sentenced all the convicts-appellants to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life, for a charge drawn for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the IPC, besides also imposed, upon the convicts sentence of fine, comprised in a sum of Rs. 25,000/- each. In default of payment of fine amount, the learned convicting Court sentenced the convicts to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year. Moreover, the learned convicting Court also sentenced convicts-appellants Subedeen, Farukh and Farmuddin @ Fammu to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months, for a charge drawn for an offence punishable under Section 354-A of the IPC, and, also imposed, upon them the sentence of fine, as comprised in a sum of Rs. 500/- each, besides in default of payment of fine amount, it sentenced the convicts (supra) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 15 days. It was also ordered that on payment of the entire fine amount, the same shall be paid, as compensation to the legal representatives of deceased Rizwan.
3. However, the period of detention, as, undergone by the convicts, during the investigations, and, trial of the case, was, in terms of Section 428 of the Cr.P.C., rather ordered to be set off, from the above imposed sentence(s) of imprisonment.
4. All the convicts being aggrieved from the above made verdict of conviction, and, also becoming aggrieved from the consequent thereto sentence(s) of imprisonment, as well as of fine, as became imposed, upon them, thus become led to institute thereagainst CRA-D-1028-DB-2018 and CRA-D-1964-DB-2018, before this Court.
Factual Background
5. The genesis of the prosecution case, becomes embodied in the appeal FIR, to which Ex. P-22 is assigned. The narrations carried in Ex. P- 22, are that on 13.9.2016, the police party led by Inspector Deep Chand (PW-14) was present at Jayanti Crossing, Hathin on patrol duty. PW-14 was informed about a quarrel taking place at village Lakhnaka culminating into death of a person. PW-14 accompanied by Ct. Rakesh, ASI Banwari Lal and Ct. Krishan Lal went to village Lakhnaka where complainant Kasim met him and present his application Ex. P1. It has been alleged in the said application that on 13.09.2016 at about 04.30 pm, complainant Kasim along with his brothers Rizwan, since deceased, Lukman and cousin Sahun, was present at his field situated in village Lakhnaka. Meanwhile, Mohd. Shakeel with her niece victim (name is withheld) appeared there riding a motor-bike for collecting millet (jawar), as the complainant party had sold millet to him. There is a tree of Neem standing in the agriculture land of village Sarpanch. He further disclosed to the police that 6/7 boys of village Jallalpur were playing cards under Neem tree. They passed lewd and sexually explicit comments against the victim, to which Mohd. Shakeel protested. Hearing the commotion, the complainant along with his brothers appeared at the spot and asked the boys to maintain the discipline. The boys became infuriated. They told the complainant party to teach them a lesson or two. In
Vicarious liability of all members of an unlawful assembly for the commission of a fatal assault.
The establishment of mens rea through eyewitness accounts confirms collective criminal liability among participants in a murder, as vicarious responsibility persists even with varying roles in the ac....
The court assigned preponderance to the credible eye witness account over the medical account and deemed the minimal digressions or contradictions in the witness's statements insignificant. The prese....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for conclusive and creditworthy evidence to support the charges against the accused, especially in cases involving eyewitness testi....
The court applied exception 4 to Section 300 of the IPC to determine the appropriate charges and convictions based on the nature of injuries and the circumstances of the incident.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of probative value in witness testimonies, the validity of identification processes, and the need for consistent and credible eviden....
The appellate court emphasized that eyewitness accounts must be given due weight, and mere flaws in investigation do not automatically discount credible testimonies in murder trials.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.