SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1908

SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Sagar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Gurmail Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Pradeep Parkash Chahar, Sr. DAG

JUDGMENT :

SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.

1. The instant appeal is directed against the verdict drawn on 13.03.2019, upon Sessions Case No.SC/11/2019, instituted on 18.01.2019/ 28.02.2019, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kaithal, wherethrough, in respect of a charge drawn for an offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC, he recorded a verdict of conviction against the convict. Moreover, through a separate sentencing order of 14.03.2019, the learned trial Judge concerned, imposed, upon, the convict the substantive sentence of 14 years of rigorous imprisonment.

2. The period spent in prison by the convict, during investigation or trial, was, in terms of Section 428 of Cr.P.C., ordered to be set off from the above imposed substantive sentence(s) of imprisonment, upon the convict.

3. The convict becomes aggrieved from the above drawn verdict of conviction besides also becomes aggrieved from the above drawn order of sentence, thus, he is led to institute thereagainst the instant appeal before this Court.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

4. The case of the prosecution is that, on 21.10.2018, one telep

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top