JUDGMENT :

Vikram Aggarwal, J

1. The present revision petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 08.05.2023 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rohtak, vide which the evidence of the petitioner was closed by the orders of the Court. The petition further assails the order dated 17.04.2023 (Annexure P-2) to the extent that it mandates that the examination of the witness will be guided only by Rule 5.1 read with Rule 5.2 and 5.3.1 of the Video Conferencing Rules (for short ‘the Rules’), issued by the Punjab & Haryana High Court.

2. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit in the year 2015 (Annexure P-3) for partition of property No.110/20, DLF Colony, Rohtak by metes and bounds. An injunction restraining the respondents-defendants from interrupting the petitioner-plaintiff from raising four walls in her portion of the property in question was also sought. Since the father of the petitioner-plaintiff namely Atul Kumar Jain was a resident of United Kingdom, an application dated 06.10.2022 (Annexure P-4) was moved by the petitioner-plaintiff seeking permission to examine him through vide