SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 277

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.
Gurpreet Singh - Petitioner
Versus
Jagir Singh and others - Respondents
CM No. 12059-CII-2023 in/and CR No. 3551 of 2023
Decided On : 17-07-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Shubham Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Piyush Setia.

The court emphasized the need for expeditious disposal of the civil suit and highlighted that applications should not be pending for an extended period.

Headnote:

Section 151 - Preponing Date of Hearing - The court allowed the application filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to preponed the date of hearing from 11.09.2023 to an earlier date.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell. The petitioner alleged deliberate delay by the defendants in the proceedings, citing a pending application for amendment of the written statement since 06.01.2023.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition with a direction to the trial court to make earnest efforts to expeditiously dispose of the civil suit and to hear and decide the pending application for amendment as soon as possible.

Issues: Deliberate delay by defendants in the proceedings, pending application for amendment of the written statement, and the need for expeditious disposal of the civil suit.

Ratio Decidendi: The court did not pass specific directions for the time frame within which the suit should be decided but emphasized that the application for amendment should not have been pending for months together.

Final Decision: The court allowed the application to preponed the date of hearing and directed the trial court to make earnest efforts to expeditiously dispose of the civil suit and to hear and decide the pending application for amendment as soon as possible.

JUDGMENT :

Vikram Aggarwal, J.

CM-12059-CII-2023

Prayer in the present application filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure is for preponing the date of hearing from 11.09.2023 to some early date.

For the reasons, mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The main petition is preponed to today.

CR-3551-2023

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of directions to the Court of Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kapurthala to decide Civil Suit No.CS/566/2018 titled as ‘Gurpreet Singh versus Jagir Singh and others’ expeditiously.

2. The petitioner filed a suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreemnt to sell dated 30.11.2015. The said suit bearing No. CS/566/2018 titled as ‘Gurpreet Singh versus Jagir Singh and others’ is now stated to be pending before the Court of Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kapurthala for 21.07.2023.

3. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the defendants are deliberately delaying the proceedings. To demonstrate the same, learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that on 06.01.2023, an application under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC was moved by defendants No.1 and 2 (respondents No.1 and 2 here) for amendment of the written statement. Reply was filed by the present petitioner-plaintiff on the very next date i.e. 13.01.2023 but the said application is pending till date. Learned counsel submits that the decision of the case be made time bound.

4. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

5. I do not intend to pass any specific directions with regard to the time frame within which the suit should be decided. However, the application for amendment should not have been pending for months together.

6. In view of the same, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to make earnest efforts to expeditiously dispose of the civil suit. A direction is also issued that on the next date of hearing, the application for amendment moved by respondents No.1 and 2 be heard and be thereafter decided as soon as possible.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top