SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 255

SUVIR SEHGAL
Jagsir Singh @ Seera – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Jasvir Singh Dhaliwal.
For the Respondent: Arun Luthra.

JUDGMENT :

SUVIR SEHGAL, J.

1. Mr. Jasvir Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner and has filed his Vakalatnama with no objection from the previous counsel, which is taken on record.

2. Instant petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking grant of post-arrest bail in:

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

13

16.01.2021

Sadar Mansa, District Mansa

22, 25 and 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short “the NDPS Act”)

3. Version of the prosecution is that FIR, Annexure P-1, has been registered when on the basis of suspicion, a motorcyclist was intercepted, who identified himself as Balwinder Singh @ Bindri and recovery of 500 tablets of Tramadol was effected from him.

4. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and has been nominated as an accused on the basis of disclosure statement of the main accused, who has been released on bail by the learned Special Court, Mansa vide order dated 18.03.2021 as the total we

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top