SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Justice Daya Chaudhary (former Judge, Punjab And Haryana High Court) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution, Department of Consumer Affairs, Through Its Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J. - The petitioner is a retired Judge of this Court and has preferred this Writ petition for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the impugned letter dated 16.05.2023 whereby the claim of the petitioner for granting the benefit of amended Rule 10 of the Consumer Protection (Qualification for Appointment, Method of Recruitment, Procedure of Appointment, Term of Office, Resignation and Removal of the President and Members of the State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 2020') has been denied AND for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to make necessary modification in the order of appointment/notification dated 13.08.2021 (Annexure P-2) issued to the petitioner in consonance with the amended Rule 10 of 2020.
2. The brief facts of this case which need to be noticed are that the petitioner, who is a retired Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, was appointed as the President of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'State Commission') on 13.08.2021. Her appointment order reflects that she was app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.